Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Tenancy in Common

Read a random definition: mixed action

A quick definition of Tenancy in Common:

Tenancy in common is a type of shared ownership of property where each owner owns a share of the property. Unlike joint tenancy, there is no right of survivorship, meaning that if one owner dies, their share goes to the person they selected in their will. Owners can have unequal shares and can freely transfer their share during their lifetime or through a will. All owners have the right to use and occupy the entire property, regardless of their share size. If a property is conveyed to two parties as tenants in common, the language "as tenants in common" should be used. If it is unclear whether a conveyance creates a tenancy in common or a joint tenancy, courts will typically interpret it as a tenancy in common.

A more thorough explanation:

A tenancy in common (TIC) is a type of shared ownership of a property. It is one of three types of concurrent estates, the others being joint tenancy and tenancy by the entirety. In a TIC, each owner owns a share of the property, which may be of unequal size, and can be freely transferred to other owners both during the owner's lifetime and via a will. All owners have the right to occupy and use the entire property, regardless of the size of their share.

For example, if A and B own a house as tenants in common, and A owns 1/3 of the house and B owns 2/3, they both have the right to occupy the entire property. If B sells his 2/3 share of the home to C, A still retains his 1/3 share in the house.

To convey property to two parties as tenants in common, the language preferred by property law is: "O conveys X property to A and B as tenants in common." If a conveyance does not explicitly show an intent to create a right of survivorship, and it is unclear as to whether the conveyor intended to create a tenancy in common or a joint tenancy, courts will typically interpret the conveyance as creating a tenancy in common, rather than a joint tenancy.

In summary, a tenancy in common is a type of shared ownership where each owner owns a share of the property, which can be of unequal size and freely transferred. All owners have the right to occupy and use the entire property, and there is no right of survivorship.

Tenancy for Years | Tenant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
The UofU has been calling people with admits which is more time consuming than just mass sending that god forsaken email (when will it be my turn)
It’s almost May and that’s making me worried
Its over this cycle
:(
20:28
WL is not R it aint over till its over
20:28
Liar ass mafucka
20:28
Waitlist is R
20:28
um
20:28
ok
20:30
@c0bra1: damn right! - GI Joe
21:14
Don't loose hope frens. It aint over, till its over, brother. -Hoya Saxa
Hey if I am on a bunch of waitlists am I screwed ?
21:39
@AlejandroAI405: Not for certain. You can get off the wait list, however it can be difficult. Would you consider reapplying next year or/and retaking the LSAT? You may drastically increase your choices/outcome(s)/and possibly get a scholarship
stay strong soldiers
10:09
What is up saturday morning gunners
10:09
@llama: RandR is a fucking joke, dont do it alejandro AI lmfao
noreaster
11:06
I genuinely do think being a reapplicant has some influence on a school’s perception of you, like we didn’t want this person before so why would we want them now? If you apply to only a couple schools your first cycle and then reapply with a higher LSAT and apply more broadly you will prob have good odds at the schools you didn’t apply to before
11:24
LMFAO why wait a year to go form UGA to chicago? You make the same biglaw salary lmfao you can get the same elite pi if you finish high, which you should if you are capable of getting chicago with a r and r. This means you advocate them not earning what they could over 4 years - 90k and study then 3 years of law or 3 years of law and then 260k salary? lmfao r and r only makes sense for FC
11:25
If someone applied with a 155 and can get a 170, a lot diff than a 168 hoping for a 172 and wasting a whole year for that
11:25
Oh i know i know i know
11:26
BUt if you want 171 r and r to get a 176+ for top FC at the top schools? okay. Everything else? Take your t25.
11:26
Scholarship dollars? Tuition + 90k income is the same or slightly less than the big law salary, but without a year of career progression.
11:27
It is not a smart move to r and r, long story short, despite what people who want you to pay for essay review and lsat tutor and lsat tutor service say
noreaster
11:58
The other point I would make is that with medians rising your 3.92 GPA might be above median at your dream school one year and below the next
13:20
Both of you make valid points, but if you do not get off the W/L your only options are to R&R or just not pursue. So yea if it makes sense and you can go this year, it may be better than R&R in hopes of better prospects next yr. the devil you know is better than the angel you don't where devil is this cycle and angel is next cycel
i don't think reapplying is going to hurt you from a previously WL/denied school
just make sure you're coming with new things on your resume. maybe a higher lsat or some work experience. a school may not of wanted you this cycle, but if you come back with stronger stats, you're gonna be what they might be looking for.
overall, i'd say work on boosting your lsat though!!
14:18
These decision times are so long, its crazy how I have to put in a deposit without knowing a couple of decisions
14:19
"rolling admissions" will haunt me forever
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.