Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

three strikes, you're out

Read a random definition: selecti judices

A quick definition of three strikes, you're out:

Term: Three Strikes, You're Out

Definition: Three Strikes, You're Out is a law that says if a person commits three serious crimes, they will be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. This law was created because people were upset that some criminals who had committed multiple violent crimes were being released from prison and committing more crimes. Some people are worried that this law is too harsh because it doesn't take into account the severity of the crimes committed or the circumstances surrounding them.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Three Strikes, You're Out is a law that was introduced in the United States in 1994. It mandates life sentences or extremely long terms without parole for criminals who have been convicted of a third felony or three felonies involving violence, rape, use of a deadly weapon, or molestation. The law was introduced to address public outrage over murders, assaults, rapes, and child molestations by released ex-convicts with records of repeated violent crimes. However, there are concerns that the law does not distinguish between violent and non-violent crimes and does not allow for judicial discretion in sentencing.

Example: In California, a man was sentenced to life in prison without parole under the Three Strikes, You're Out law. He had been convicted of two non-violent felonies in the past and was then found guilty of stealing a pair of socks from a department store. Because this was his third felony, he was given a life sentence.

Explanation: This example illustrates how the Three Strikes, You're Out law can be controversial. The man in this example was given a life sentence for a non-violent crime, which some people argue is too harsh. Others argue that the law is necessary to keep repeat offenders off the streets and prevent them from committing more serious crimes.

Thirty-day notice | tide lands

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 10 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:51
Do you need camera on/mic on for those Lets Talk Cornell things? I kinda want to attend but I'm at work
jackfrost11770
16:51
I have no idea I've never been to one
jackfrost11770
16:51
Hence Idk what to expect even capacity wise
jackfrost11770
16:51
But I'm literally still 30 minutes from home and it's in 10 min so unless I join on my phone with no camera or mic then I cannot lmao
jackfrost11770
16:55
You know what if Cornell don't want me they don't me I'm not worrying myself over this
16:57
There was a Vandy wave today?
GodsPlanUltimately
16:57
@jackfrost11770: What a excellent mindset. Cornell must have poor taste
1. Kansas 196. Cornell
nope cornell can be 2.
cornell is incredibly based
our professors are sigmapilled goonmaxxers
i see, a quality education
GodsPlanUltimately
16:59
Interesting folks.
jackfrost11770
17:00
Cornell put me on reserve after interview they are at least slightly unbased
@jackfrost11770: thats why they sit at 2
cornell is based but universal rule is adcoms are ghouls
texaslawhopefully
17:01
this is depressing lol: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/boilingfrogs/shock-and-awe/
Dkk
17:01
@GodsPlanUltimately smart of them
Dkk
17:02
How is it unpopular when he got the pop vote and the electoral college. Unreadable after the title.
Who’s hearing from uclaaa rnnnn
texaslawhopefully
17:03
Glad you're back dk lmao. If you read the actual article, it's that his day one EO's are wildly unpopular (for instance the majority of americans support birthright citizenship). He can have won the popular vote and still do unpopular stuff
texaslawhopefully
17:03
"Two recent polls found opposition to pardoning the J6ers at 57 and 59 percent, respectively, and that was before Americans understood that even the cop-beaters in the crowd that day would be let off scot-free."
I wonder if this chat has mods
17:04
as most dictators who have come into power do, he appealed to the masses just to turn face once in power
Barely nutty
Dkk
17:04
@texas maybe so. Maybe so.
17:04
we have been duped.
17:05
Oh well there is always the next election.* *- unless there are no more elections.
texaslawhopefully
17:05
I lean conservative and for a long time was one of those people who thought that he was bad but wasn't a facist and that sort of rhetoric was over-reactive. And for those reasons I voted for Harris, but I think I was underestimating him by far.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.