Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Tucker Act

Read a random definition: suus heres

A quick definition of Tucker Act:

The Tucker Act is a law that says the United States government can be sued for certain things, even though normally the government can't be sued. The law allows people to make claims for things like money owed to them by the government or if the government takes their property without paying for it. There are two types of claims: ones where the person had a contract with the government and ones where they didn't but still think they should be paid. The court that handles these claims is called the United States Court of Federal Claims. If the claim is for more than $10,000, only that court can hear it. If it's for less than $10,000, it can also be heard in other courts. Before 1982, a different court handled these claims.

A more thorough explanation:

The Tucker Act is a law passed in 1887 that allows individuals to sue the United States government for certain types of claims. Normally, the government is immune to lawsuits, but the Tucker Act waives this immunity for specific claims.

The Tucker Act covers three types of claims:

  1. Contractual claims
  2. Non-contractual claims where the plaintiff seeks the return of money paid to the government
  3. Non-contractual claims where the plaintiff asserts that they are entitled to payment by the government

For example, if a company enters into a contract with the government to provide goods or services and the government breaches the contract, the company can sue under the Tucker Act. Similarly, if an individual pays money to the government for a service that is not provided, they can sue to get their money back.

The Tucker Act also covers claims related to the Constitution, federal statutes or regulations, and claims that do not arise from torts. This includes claims for damages resulting from the government taking private property for public use without just compensation, which is protected by the Fifth Amendment.

The United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over Tucker Act claims. Claims over $10,000 must be filed exclusively with this court, while claims under $10,000 can be filed concurrently with federal district courts.

Truth in Lending Act (TILA) | turn state's evidence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.