Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

vadiare duellum

Read a random definition: jus poenitendi

A quick definition of vadiare duellum:

Term: vadiare duellum

Definition: Vadiare duellum is a Latin term that means "to wage the duel." In history, it referred to the act of giving pledges to each other to engage in trial by combat. This means that two people would agree to fight each other to settle a dispute, and they would both promise to follow through with the fight.

A more thorough explanation:

vadiare duellum

vadiare duellum is a Latin term used in history to describe the act of giving pledges to each other to engage in trial by combat. This means that two people would agree to fight each other to settle a dispute, and they would both promise to show up and fight.

An example of vadiare duellum would be two knights in medieval times who had a disagreement over who owned a piece of land. They might agree to vadiare duellum and fight each other with swords to determine who was right.

Another example would be two samurai in feudal Japan who had a disagreement over who should be the leader of their clan. They might agree to vadiare duellum and fight each other with swords to determine who was the better warrior and therefore the better leader.

These examples illustrate the definition of vadiare duellum because in both cases, the two parties agreed to fight each other to settle a dispute. They gave pledges to each other that they would show up and fight, and the winner would be declared the winner of the dispute.

vades | vadiare legem

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.