Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

vocatio in jus

Read a random definition: luctuosa hereditas

A quick definition of vocatio in jus:

Term: VOCATIO IN JUS

Definition: In ancient Rome, when someone wanted to sue another person, they would call them to appear before a judge. This was called "vocatio in jus". The person who was being sued had to go with the person who was suing them.

VOCATION: A job or career that someone does regularly.

VOCIFERATIO: A loud shouting or outcry.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Vocatio in jus is a Latin term used in Roman law. It refers to the oral summoning of a defendant by a plaintiff to appear before a magistrate. The plaintiff would formally request the defendant to accompany them.

In ancient Rome, if someone had a legal dispute with another person, they would use vocatio in jus to summon the other person to court. For example, if someone owed money to another person and refused to pay, the creditor could use vocatio in jus to bring the debtor to court and settle the matter.

Definition: Vocation refers to a person's regular calling, business, occupation, or profession.

Some examples of vocations include teaching, nursing, engineering, and accounting. If someone is a teacher, their vocation is teaching. If someone is a nurse, their vocation is nursing.

Definition: Vociferatio is a Latin term used in history. It refers to an outcry or hue and cry.

In medieval times, if someone committed a crime, the villagers would use vociferatio to alert others and chase after the criminal. For example, if someone stole a chicken, the villagers would shout and make noise to alert others and catch the thief.

vocare ad curiam | voco

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:29
@LawIsForPeasants: hey.
Vandy gettin fat, that's what bandi did
Dont agree dkk but out of messages so this is a talk for another day
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.