Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

vouching-in

Read a random definition: bankruptcy judge

A quick definition of vouching-in:

Vouching-in is a legal process where a defendant can notify a third party who may also be responsible for the subject matter of the lawsuit. This way, the third party will be bound by the court's decision. It is an invitation to a person who is liable to the defendant in a lawsuit to intervene and defend. If the invitation is denied and the defendant later sues the invited person, the latter is bound by any determination of fact common to the two lawsuits. It is also known as impleader.

A more thorough explanation:

Vouching-in is a legal term that refers to a procedural device used in a lawsuit. It involves inviting a third party who may be liable for the subject matter of the suit to intervene and defend themselves. This is done so that if the invitation is denied and the defendant later sues the invited party, the latter is bound by any determination of fact common to the two lawsuits.

1. In a product liability lawsuit, a manufacturer may vouch-in a supplier who provided a defective component that caused the injury. By doing so, the manufacturer can shift some of the liability to the supplier.

2. In a construction dispute, a general contractor may vouch-in a subcontractor who performed faulty work that led to damages. The subcontractor can then defend themselves and potentially share in the liability if the court finds them at fault.

These examples illustrate how vouching-in can be used to bring in third parties who may be responsible for the harm or damages in a lawsuit. It allows for a more comprehensive resolution of the matter and ensures that all parties who may be liable are held accountable.

voucher to warranty | vouch over

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.