Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

wildcard exemption

Read a random definition: standby counsel

A quick definition of wildcard exemption:

Wildcard exemption: A special rule that helps protect some of a person's things (like a special toy or family heirloom) from being taken away by people they owe money to. This rule can be used along with other rules that protect specific things like a house or car. The amount of protection varies depending on where a person lives, but it's usually between $400 and $30,000.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Wildcard exemption is a legal provision that protects some of the debtor’s personal assets from creditors during bankruptcy. It is one of the few exemptions allowed by the Federal government and state governments.

The wildcard exemption can be applied to any of a person’s assets, such as a sentimental heirloom, and is often used in combination with other exemptions.

For example, if a person owns a car worth more than the motor vehicle exemption, they can use the wildcard exemption to protect the additional value of the car.

In Federal bankruptcy, the wildcard exemption is $1,250 plus any unused homestead exemptions up to $11,850. However, the amount of the wildcard exemption can vary from state to state. For instance, in Maine, it is $400, while in California, it can be over $30,000.

Example: John is filing for bankruptcy and has a collection of rare coins worth $2,000. He can use the wildcard exemption to protect the entire value of his coin collection, as it is not covered by any other exemption.

Explanation: This example illustrates how the wildcard exemption can be used to protect assets that are not covered by any other exemption. In this case, John's rare coin collection is not covered by any specific exemption, so he can use the wildcard exemption to protect its entire value.

widower | wilful killing

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.