Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Williams Act

Read a random definition: legruita

A quick definition of Williams Act:

The Williams Act is a law that was made in 1968 to change the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. It says that if someone owns more than 5% of a company's stock, they have to give certain information to the SEC and follow certain rules when they want to buy more stock.

A more thorough explanation:

The Williams Act is a law passed by the United States government in 1968. It changed the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making it mandatory for investors who own more than 5% of a company's stock to provide specific information to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Additionally, these investors must follow certain rules when making a tender offer.

Let's say that an investor owns 6% of a company's stock. Under the Williams Act, this investor must inform the SEC of their ownership and intentions. If the investor wants to make a tender offer to buy more shares of the company, they must follow specific rules and regulations.

Another example could be an investor who owns 10% of a company's stock. They would also be required to provide information to the SEC and follow the rules of the Williams Act if they wanted to make a tender offer.

These examples illustrate how the Williams Act applies to investors who own more than 5% of a company's stock. The law aims to provide transparency and fairness in the stock market by requiring investors to disclose their ownership and intentions, which can help protect other shareholders from unfair practices.

willful wrong | Wills Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.