Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Wills Act

Read a random definition: fugitive warrant

A quick definition of Wills Act:

The Wills Act is a law that was created in England in 1837. It allows people to decide what happens to all of their things after they die. This law has very specific rules that must be followed in order for a will to be considered valid. Some states still follow these strict rules today. The Wills Act is also known as Lord Langdale's Act.

A more thorough explanation:

The Wills Act is a law that was passed in England in 1837. It allows people to decide what happens to their property after they die. This law is important because it gives people the power to control their assets even after they are gone.

The Wills Act has specific requirements for a will to be considered valid. For example, the person making the will must be of sound mind and must sign the document in the presence of witnesses. These requirements ensure that the person's wishes are clear and that there is no confusion or dispute over the distribution of their property.

Some states in the United States still follow the strict requirements of the Wills Act, while others have adopted more modern laws. For example, the Uniform Probate Code has simplified the process of creating a valid will.

Example: John wants to leave his house to his daughter when he dies. He writes a will that meets the requirements of the Wills Act, including signing it in the presence of witnesses. After John passes away, his daughter is able to inherit the house according to his wishes.

Example: Sarah lives in a state that follows the Wills Act. She wants to leave her car to her friend, but she forgets to have the will witnessed. When Sarah dies, her friend is not able to inherit the car because the will is not considered valid under the Wills Act.

Williams Act | will substitute

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.