Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

withholding of evidence

Read a random definition: sum

A quick definition of withholding of evidence:

Withholding of Evidence: When someone intentionally keeps important information or proof from being presented in a legal case, it is called withholding of evidence. This is a serious offense because it can prevent justice from being served and can lead to innocent people being punished. It is important to always tell the truth and provide all relevant information when involved in a legal matter.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Withholding of evidence refers to the act of intentionally hiding or suppressing evidence that could be used in a legal case. This is considered a serious offense as it obstructs justice and can lead to wrongful convictions or acquittals.

Example: A police officer who fails to disclose important information or evidence that could exonerate a suspect is guilty of withholding evidence. For instance, if a witness comes forward with information that contradicts the prosecution's case, but the police officer chooses not to include it in the investigation report, this would be considered withholding of evidence.

Another example: A prosecutor who intentionally withholds evidence that could help the defense is also guilty of this offense. For example, if a prosecutor fails to disclose a witness statement that could exonerate the defendant, this would be considered withholding of evidence.

These examples illustrate how withholding of evidence can lead to an unfair trial and a miscarriage of justice. It is important for all parties involved in a legal case to disclose all relevant evidence to ensure a fair and just outcome.

withheld sentence | withholding tax

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.