Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

withholding of evidence

Read a random definition: crimes against persons

A quick definition of withholding of evidence:

Withholding of Evidence: When someone intentionally keeps important information or proof from being presented in a legal case, it is called withholding of evidence. This is a serious offense because it can prevent justice from being served and can lead to innocent people being punished. It is important to always tell the truth and provide all relevant information when involved in a legal matter.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Withholding of evidence refers to the act of intentionally hiding or suppressing evidence that could be used in a legal case. This is considered a serious offense as it obstructs justice and can lead to wrongful convictions or acquittals.

Example: A police officer who fails to disclose important information or evidence that could exonerate a suspect is guilty of withholding evidence. For instance, if a witness comes forward with information that contradicts the prosecution's case, but the police officer chooses not to include it in the investigation report, this would be considered withholding of evidence.

Another example: A prosecutor who intentionally withholds evidence that could help the defense is also guilty of this offense. For example, if a prosecutor fails to disclose a witness statement that could exonerate the defendant, this would be considered withholding of evidence.

These examples illustrate how withholding of evidence can lead to an unfair trial and a miscarriage of justice. It is important for all parties involved in a legal case to disclose all relevant evidence to ensure a fair and just outcome.

withheld sentence | withholding tax

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.