Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

words actionable in themselves

Read a random definition: caeteris tacentibus

A quick definition of words actionable in themselves:

Libel is when someone says or writes something bad about another person that is not true and can harm their reputation. It can be in writing, pictures, or even electronic messages. If the statement is harmful on its own, it is called libel per se. If it only becomes harmful when other circumstances are considered, it is called libel per quod. Libel used to be a crime, but now it is only a civil wrong.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Words that are libelous or slanderous in and of themselves, without the need for additional proof of harm or damages. This type of language is known as libel per se or slander per se.

Example: A statement like "John is a thief" is considered libel per se because it directly accuses John of a crime and can harm his reputation without any further evidence needed.

Other examples of words actionable in themselves include:

  • Accusations of having a contagious disease
  • Accusations of being involved in illegal activities
  • Accusations of being unchaste or immoral

These examples illustrate how certain statements can be damaging to a person's reputation without any additional proof needed. They are considered inherently harmful and can be the basis for a libel or slander lawsuit.

word of art | words of limitation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.