Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

writ of certiorari

Read a random definition: opinion work product

A quick definition of writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a special type of legal order that allows a higher court to review a case from a lower court. The word "certiorari" means "to be more fully informed" in Latin. This writ is used by the U.S. Supreme Court to select most of the cases it hears. It orders the lower court to provide its record in a case so that the higher court can review it. This writ is not used very often and can be changed by laws or court rules.

A more thorough explanation:

A writ of certiorari is a legal order that a higher court issues to a lower court, requesting the lower court to send up the records of a case for review. The term "certiorari" comes from Latin and means "to be informed." This writ is used to determine whether a lower court has made an error of law that requires correction by a higher court.

The writ of certiorari is commonly used by the United States Supreme Court to select cases it hears. The Supreme Court receives thousands of petitions each year, but it only grants certiorari to a small percentage of them. The court uses the writ to review cases that involve important legal questions or conflicts between lower courts.

For example, if a state court of appeals makes a decision that conflicts with a decision made by another state court of appeals, the Supreme Court may issue a writ of certiorari to resolve the conflict and establish a uniform rule of law.

Another example is when a federal court of appeals makes a decision that conflicts with a decision made by a state supreme court. In this case, the Supreme Court may issue a writ of certiorari to determine which court's decision should prevail.

In summary, a writ of certiorari is a legal order that allows a higher court to review the decision of a lower court. The writ is used to correct errors of law, resolve conflicts between lower courts, and establish uniform rules of law.

writ of attachment | writ of coram nobis

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.