Head-to-head · 41 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 98% chose UCLA. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 41 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Median scholarship (chose UCLA)
Median scholarship (chose ASU)
View all-time (78 cross-admits)
Trend · UCLA's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509Financial
Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden 2025 ABA 509Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2024 ABA EmploymentCross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesOverview
About UCLA vs ASU
Across 41 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 98% enrolled at University of California—Los Angeles and 2% at Arizona State University.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares University of California—Los Angeles and Arizona State University across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 41 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 41 applicants admitted to both schools, 98% chose to attend University of California—Los Angeles. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of California—Los Angeles is ranked #13 compared to #44 — a gap of 31 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
There is a meaningful difference in admissions competitiveness: University of California—Los Angeles has a median LSAT of 171 compared to 165, a gap of 6 points. This suggests applicants to University of California—Los Angeles face a more competitive admissions pool.
University of California—Los Angeles is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 12.1% compared to Arizona State University's 19.8%.
University of California—Los Angeles is located in Los Angeles, California, while Arizona State University is in Tempe, Arizona. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of California—Los Angeles places 50.5% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 11.0% for the other school. This 40 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, Arizona State University has lower tuition at $28,390 per year compared to $59,084. Combined with employment rates of 94.4% (UCLA) and 93.5% (ASU), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Among cross-admitted applicants, Arizona State University offered a median scholarship of $99,000 compared to $64,623, a difference of $34,377 that may factor into enrollment decisions.