Head-to-head · 67 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 82% chose UMich. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 67 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose Cornell University
Typical aid · ABA 509 · 2025
per yearCross-admits who enrolled · self-reported, 3-yr award
View all-time (284 cross-admits)
Trend · Cornell University's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price and scholarship aid 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2025 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Harvard University
111
Columbia University
80
University of Pennsylvania
63
University of Virginia
53
New York University
49
Overview
About Cornell University vs UMich
Across 67 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 18% enrolled at Cornell University and 82% at University of Michigan. The split has shifted -2 points across the tracked cycles.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares Cornell University and University of Michigan across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 67 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 67 applicants admitted to both schools, 82% chose to attend University of Michigan. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
Both schools are closely ranked in U.S. News: #9 and #13, separated by just 4 positions, making cross-admit data especially useful for deciding between them.
University of Michigan is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 8.6% compared to Cornell University's 18.2%.
Cornell University is located in Ithaca, New York, while University of Michigan is in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
On cost, University of Michigan has lower tuition at $76,108 per year compared to $84,722. Combined with employment rates of 99.5% (Cornell University) and 97.7% (UMich), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Among cross-admitted applicants who enrolled, those choosing University of Michigan reported a higher median scholarship — $150,000 versus $135,000 over three years — though aid is one of several factors behind the enrollment decision.
Your study break just got better: follow @lawschooldata on Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram