Head-to-head · 28 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 86% chose UCLA. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 28 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose UCLA
Median scholarship (chose UCLA)
Median scholarship (chose UMN)
View all-time (58 cross-admits)
Trend · UCLA's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2024 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About UCLA vs UMN
Across 28 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 86% enrolled at University of California—Los Angeles and 14% at University of Minnesota.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares University of California—Los Angeles and University of Minnesota across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 28 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 28 applicants admitted to both schools, 86% chose to attend University of California—Los Angeles. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of California—Los Angeles is ranked #13 compared to #22 — a gap of 9 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
University of California—Los Angeles is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 12.1% compared to University of Minnesota's 26.7%.
University of California—Los Angeles is located in Los Angeles, California, while University of Minnesota is in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of California—Los Angeles places 50.5% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 16.1% for the other school. This 34 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, University of Minnesota has lower tuition at $51,440 per year compared to $59,084. Combined with employment rates of 94.4% (UCLA) and 95.2% (UMN), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Among cross-admitted applicants, University of Minnesota offered a median scholarship of $105,000 compared to $53,000, a difference of $52,000 that may factor into enrollment decisions.