Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

a morte testatoris

Read a random definition: summary conviction

A quick definition of a morte testatoris:

Term: A MORTE TESTATORIS

Definition: A morte testatoris means "from the death of the testator" in Latin. This phrase is used in legal contexts to refer to the moment when a beneficiary becomes entitled to receive a legacy from a deceased person's estate. In simpler terms, it is the point at which someone inherits something after the person who left it to them has passed away.

A more thorough explanation:

A MORTE TESTATORIS

A morte testatoris is a Latin term that refers to the moment when a legacy becomes effective and vests in the beneficiary after the death of the testator.

For example, if a person leaves a sum of money to their niece in their will, the legacy will only become effective and vest in the niece a morte testatoris, that is, after the death of the person who made the will.

Another example is if a person leaves their house to their son in their will, the son will only become the owner of the house a morte testatoris, that is, after the death of the person who made the will.

A morte testatoris is a legal term that is used to describe the moment when a legacy becomes effective and vests in the beneficiary after the death of the person who made the will. This means that the beneficiary will only receive the legacy after the death of the testator, and not before. The examples illustrate how a legacy becomes effective and vests in the beneficiary a morte testatoris, that is, after the death of the person who made the will.

Amnesty International | amortization reserve

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.