Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

bonorum possessio contra tabulas

Read a random definition: cujus haeredibus maxime prospicitur

A quick definition of bonorum possessio contra tabulas:

Bonorum possessio contra tabulas is a Latin term that means "possession of goods contrary to the terms of the will" in Roman law. It refers to an order that allows someone to take possession of an estate even if the will says otherwise. This can happen if the testator left out a daughter or an emancipated son who was not expressly disinherited. The legacies in the will still apply, but if the testator left out any male in their power, the will becomes invalid and intestacy results. The Praetor, a Roman magistrate, could not change the validity of a will, but they could give bonorum possessio to someone, whether they were the heres (heir) or not, which gave them the power to take possession of the goods by appropriate steps.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Bonorum possessio contra tabulas is a Latin term that means "possession of goods contrary to the terms of the will" in Roman law. It refers to an order that allows someone to take possession of an estate that goes against the wishes of the testator in their will.

For example, if a testator passed over their daughter or an emancipated son who was not expressly disinherited, a magistrate could make an order for bonorum possessio contra tabulas. This would allow the applicant to take possession of the estate, even though it went against the terms of the will.

It's important to note that the legacies in the will would still be valid, but if the testator passed over any male in their power (patria potestas), the will would be invalidated, and intestacy would result.

Overall, bonorum possessio contra tabulas was a way for magistrates to ensure that the wishes of the testator were respected, even if they didn't follow the traditional rules of inheritance.

bono et malo | bonum factum

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.