Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Legislative Background

Read a random definition: quasi-affinity

A quick definition of Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Legislative Background:

The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 was created to stop spam emails and other online threats that harm the internet and its users. The law requires that people must give permission before sending spam emails, and it prohibits false or misleading information in emails. It also sets penalties for those who break the law and allows individuals and companies to take legal action against spammers. The law was created after a task force investigated the problem of spam and made recommendations for how to stop it.

A more thorough explanation:

The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 is a law that was created to address the growing problem of spam email in Canada. The law was created after a private-sector "Task Force on Spam" was established in 2004 to investigate solutions to the problem.

The Task Force proposed a six-point stakeholder consensus plan for addressing the problem, which included:

  • Making use of existing legal frameworks
  • Reviewing current legislative, regulatory, and enforcement measures
  • Encouraging network management practices and industry best-practice principles
  • Encouraging the development of technologies to validate legitimate commercial email
  • Encouraging businesses to educate consumers about spam-related problems
  • Supporting global anti-spam initiatives

After a year of investigation, the Task Force recommended legislation, regulation, and enforcement to address spam-related problems. The recommendations included:

  • A clear set of rules to prohibit spam and other emerging threats to the safety and security of the Internet
  • An opt-in regime for spam
  • Prohibition of false or misleading headers or subject lines
  • Prohibition of the construction of false or misleading URLs and websites
  • Prohibition of email address harvesting
  • Penalties for offenders, ranging from civil liability to criminal liability
  • A private right of action for individuals and corporations
  • Liability for third parties benefited by spam
  • Administration of a new stand-alone law
  • Priority and resources for administration and enforcement from the Canadian Federal Government
  • Coordinated enforcement with Canadian Provincial and Territorial Government enforcement agencies, as well as with other countries' enforcement agencies

The law was finally enacted in December 2010 as Bill C-28.

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Introduction and Abbreviations | Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Legislative Purposes

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
was friday a umich R wave?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.