Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

clearly-erroneous standard

Read a random definition: in-marriage

A quick definition of clearly-erroneous standard:

The clearly-erroneous standard is a way for a higher court to review how a lower court made decisions based on facts. Basically, the higher court will only change the lower court's decision if they are really sure that the lower court made a mistake.

A more thorough explanation:

The clearly-erroneous standard is a legal term used to describe the standard of review that an appellate court usually applies when reviewing a trial court's treatment of factual issues. Under this standard, a judgment will be upheld unless the appellate court is left with the firm conviction that an error has been committed.

For example, if a trial court finds that a defendant is guilty of a crime based on the evidence presented at trial, the appellate court will apply the clearly-erroneous standard when reviewing that finding. The appellate court will only overturn the trial court's finding if it is convinced that the trial court made a mistake in its interpretation of the evidence.

Another example would be in a civil case where a trial court finds that a plaintiff is entitled to damages based on the evidence presented at trial. The appellate court will apply the clearly-erroneous standard when reviewing that finding. The appellate court will only overturn the trial court's finding if it is convinced that the trial court made a mistake in its interpretation of the evidence.

These examples illustrate how the clearly-erroneous standard is used to ensure that trial court judgments are not overturned unless there is a clear error in the interpretation of the evidence presented at trial.

clearings | clear market value

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:44
im still in the queue to be reviewed for penn so
lilypadfrog
14:44
@SplitterusClitterus: I applied like two weeks later. It was one of my last apps
jackfrost11770
14:44
I mean I think you're more likely to get WL than R at UPenn lmao, I'm taking it as an R whatever
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:45
Tru
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:45
notHim at it again
14:45
notHim is a born WINNER
14:47
ya i basically have penn r
Trismegistus
14:48
how would you know
14:48
uh wdym. i didnt get penn A or penn WL
jackfrost11770
14:48
Check substatus, it's not an update. I didn't even notice it at first
14:48
Substatus?
14:48
i cant get into my penn rn so im just assuming
14:48
same @Eggan
cumsock
14:49
carole baskin sold all her land
14:49
If it says under committee review I’m still alive right
cumsock
14:49
for 20 million fuckin dollars
Trismegistus
14:49
that's what mine saying @sadpadresfan
14:50
ya im on the plane so it wont let me log into lsac for some readon
14:50
for another 2 hours
lilypadfrog
14:50
im out here in miamiiiii
14:50
Whoa someone got Penn WL but Harvard A earlier what the heck
Trismegistus
14:50
happens all the time
14:51
I stg every time I see you that Jorge Ben song starts playing in my head again
Trismegistus
14:51
LOL
jackfrost11770
14:53
Egg not necessarily, I didn't get an email. It just says waitlist in application status which is mad annoying lol. At least tell us what you want like a LOCI or anything
14:54
i cannot get into my portal
14:54
i will not know
14:54
delta have better wifi challenge
cumsock
14:55
i dont think william and mary is sending me that interview invite
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.