Simple English definitions for legal terms
Read a random definition: mail or telephone order rule
The clearly-erroneous standard is a way for a higher court to review how a lower court made decisions based on facts. Basically, the higher court will only change the lower court's decision if they are really sure that the lower court made a mistake.
The clearly-erroneous standard is a legal term used to describe the standard of review that an appellate court usually applies when reviewing a trial court's treatment of factual issues. Under this standard, a judgment will be upheld unless the appellate court is left with the firm conviction that an error has been committed.
For example, if a trial court finds that a defendant is guilty of a crime based on the evidence presented at trial, the appellate court will apply the clearly-erroneous standard when reviewing that finding. The appellate court will only overturn the trial court's finding if it is convinced that the trial court made a mistake in its interpretation of the evidence.
Another example would be in a civil case where a trial court finds that a plaintiff is entitled to damages based on the evidence presented at trial. The appellate court will apply the clearly-erroneous standard when reviewing that finding. The appellate court will only overturn the trial court's finding if it is convinced that the trial court made a mistake in its interpretation of the evidence.
These examples illustrate how the clearly-erroneous standard is used to ensure that trial court judgments are not overturned unless there is a clear error in the interpretation of the evidence presented at trial.