LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

conflict out

Read a random definition: estreat

A quick definition of conflict out:

Term: CONFLICT OUT

Definition: When a lawyer or judge cannot participate in a case because they have a personal or professional connection to one of the people involved. This is to make sure that everyone is treated fairly and there is no bias.

A more thorough explanation:

Conflict out is a verb that means to disqualify a lawyer or judge from a case because of a conflict of interest. For example, if a judge had previously represented one of the parties involved in a case, they would be conflicted out of that case.

Example 1: The judge was conflicted out of the case because he had previously represented one of the litigants.

Example 2: The lawyer was conflicted out of the case because he had a personal relationship with one of the parties involved.

These examples illustrate how a conflict of interest can lead to a lawyer or judge being disqualified from a case. It is important for legal professionals to avoid conflicts of interest to ensure that they can provide fair and impartial representation.

conflict of authority | conflict preemption

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

texaslawhopefully

21:03

Congrats1!

Ratratta

21:15

Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.

Ratratta

21:15

Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!

[] baddestbunny

22:16

every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles

Dkk

22:32

Nice! @Macaque

Dkk

22:32

@Aromatic, Have to guess.

Dkk

22:33

That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?

[] baddestbunny

22:40

I said accosted not assaulted

JazzyGazelle

23:35

guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad

1a2b3c4d26z

23:37

Oooooo me too

JazzyGazelle

23:37

omg is this good or bad

Dkk

23:47

Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.

JazzyGazelle

23:49

it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??

180SupremeWarrior

23:53

hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?

Dkk

0:10

No idea

windyMagician

0:34

reporting live to say my ndls address also went long

JazzyGazelle

0:59

does it mean anything ^

Dkk

2:21

NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.

[] baddestbunny

4:29

let’s get after it boys and girls

Dkk

5:21

I gtg to bed soon.

Dkk

5:22

Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.

jackfrost11770

5:37

good morning lsd it is 5 am EST

jackfrost11770

5:37

also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything

jackfrost11770

5:38

my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review

WorthlessAttractiveZombie

7:44

My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs

WorthlessAttractiveZombie

7:46

Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night

Manysko

7:55

@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning

Manysko

7:56

Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week

soapy

8:48

UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December

HowlEngineer

8:57

Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.