Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

constitutional-fact doctrine

Read a random definition: pay-or-play contract

A quick definition of constitutional-fact doctrine:

The constitutional-fact doctrine is a rule that says federal courts don't have to agree with an administrative agency's findings of fact if those facts involve whether the agency has gone beyond its constitutional limits, especially when it comes to personal rights. Instead, the courts will review the facts themselves to make sure that constitutional rights are protected. This rule isn't used as much anymore, but it hasn't been completely thrown out.

A more thorough explanation:

The constitutional-fact doctrine is a rule that federal courts are not required to follow an administrative agency's findings of fact when the facts involve whether the agency has exceeded constitutional limitations on its power, especially regarding personal rights. This means that the courts can review the facts independently to ensure that constitutional rights are protected.

For example, if an administrative agency makes a decision that affects an individual's right to free speech, a federal court can review the facts of the case to determine whether the agency's decision violates the First Amendment of the Constitution. The court can make its own findings of fact, rather than relying on the agency's findings.

Another example is if an administrative agency makes a decision that affects an individual's right to due process, a federal court can review the facts of the case to determine whether the agency's decision violates the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. The court can make its own findings of fact, rather than relying on the agency's findings.

The constitutional-fact doctrine is important because it ensures that constitutional rights are protected, even if an administrative agency has made a decision that violates those rights. It allows federal courts to independently review the facts of a case to ensure that the Constitution is being upheld.

constitutional convention | constitutional freedom

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.