Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Franks hearing

Read a random definition: arbitrary trademark

A quick definition of Franks hearing:

Franks hearing: A special court hearing to decide if a police officer lied in their written statement to get permission to search someone's property. If the officer did lie, any evidence found during the search cannot be used in court. This type of hearing is named after a court case called Franks v. Delaware.

A more thorough explanation:

A Franks hearing is a legal proceeding that determines whether a police officer's affidavit used to obtain a search warrant that yields incriminating evidence was based on false statements by the police officer. This hearing is named after the landmark case Franks v. Delaware, which established the legal standard for challenging the validity of a search warrant.

For example, if a police officer provides false information in an affidavit to obtain a search warrant, and the search results in the discovery of incriminating evidence, a Franks hearing may be held to determine whether the warrant was obtained lawfully. If the court finds that the officer provided false information, the evidence obtained from the search may be suppressed and excluded from the trial.

Franks hearings are important because they protect individuals from unlawful searches and seizures by law enforcement. They ensure that police officers are held accountable for providing truthful information in search warrant affidavits and prevent them from using false information to obtain evidence against individuals.

frankpledge | frank-tenant

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
It does. Really bad, I think my boss new I was crying in my car lolllll
sorry that sucks
That’s good! You got a good routine going?
It’s ok, we ball
we ball
Yesirrrr
yeah, try to get most of the readings done on the weekends so the weeks arent as bad
hurting for free time though
Quillinit
11:52
wasp i just looked at your cycle and did you like pee in the shoes of admissions officers?
the retroactive withdrawls really hurt me
made them question my ability to stick through law school
withdrawals in undergrad?
yeah 2 years of classes
Quillinit
11:57
ah you filed retro W's from classes in UG?
Quillinit
11:58
ah okay, sorry homie that's rough
it's fine i got into one of my top choices so im really happy
Quillinit
11:58
<3 happy for you
getting into cornell is hugeee
ayyyyy
Quillinit
11:59
^^^^^ would love to get into Cornell lmao
Quillinit
11:59
or anywhere!
you got it, believeeee
12:06
@letsseehowitgoesnow: you okay?
12:08
@ KnowledgeableRitzyWasp did u withdraw frm all your classes for two years or just a few? i have 2 W's
12:23
listening to the front bottoms at the gym again ist es over fur mich?
My wife and I saw TFB with manchester orchestra the night before thanksgiving a few years back and it was pretty damn choice
shaquilleoatmeal
12:27
yoo lets dawg what happened, you good?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.