Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

indult

Read a random definition: automatic disclosure

A quick definition of indult:

An indult is a permission given by the Pope to do something that goes against the rules of the church. In the past, indults were often given for political reasons. For example, a king or queen might be given an indult to choose a church leader without interference from the Pope. Other groups, like the parliament of Paris or the college of cardinals, could also be given similar privileges. Indults are sometimes called indultos.

A more thorough explanation:

An indult is a special permission granted by the Pope to do something that goes against the rules of the Catholic Church. This permission is also known as indulto.

Indults were often given for political reasons. For example, a king or queen might be given an indult that allowed them to choose a church leader without interference from the Pope. Other groups, like the parliament of Paris or the college of cardinals, might also be given special privileges through an indult.

One example of an indult was given to King Henry VIII of England in the 16th century. The Pope allowed him to divorce his wife, which was normally not allowed in the Catholic Church. This was a political move, as Henry VIII wanted to marry someone else and needed the Pope's permission to do so.

Another example of an indult was given to the Society of St. Pius X in 2007. This group had been excommunicated from the Catholic Church, but the Pope granted them an indult that allowed them to celebrate Mass and perform other religious rites.

Overall, an indult is a special permission granted by the Pope for political or religious reasons. It allows someone to do something that would normally be against the rules of the Catholic Church.

induction | indulto

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.