Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

law book

Read a random definition: mitigator

A quick definition of law book:

A law book is a collection of many books that talk about laws. These books can include things like rules, reports of cases, summaries of laws, and even dictionaries. They help people understand what the laws are and how they work. There are books for every state and country, and they are updated often to make sure they have the latest information. Some law books are now on computers instead of paper.

A more thorough explanation:

A law book is a collection of volumes that deal with various aspects of the law. It includes:

  • Statutes
  • Reports of cases
  • Digests of cases
  • Commentaries on particular topics
  • Encyclopedias
  • Textbooks
  • Summaries of the law
  • Dictionaries
  • Legal forms

Law books can be a combination of these, such as case reports with commentaries. They are regularly updated with the latest decisions, legislative enactments, and recent comments.

For example, the Federal Code is a law book that contains all the federal laws of the United States. It includes comments, annotations, and brief statements of decisions that contribute to the interpretation of each particular statute.

Another example is the collections of digests of case decisions divided by topics that are available for each state as well as federal rulings. These digests provide brief summaries of case decisions, making it easier for lawyers and law students to understand the law.

Law books are essential for lawyers, judges, and law students to understand the law and make informed decisions. They are also useful for anyone who wants to learn more about the law and their legal rights.

labor and materials | leading

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.