Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

leading

Read a random definition: right of preemption

A quick definition of leading:

Leading: When a lawyer asks a question in a way that suggests the answer they want to hear, it is called leading. This is not allowed if the witness is on the same side as the lawyer. However, it is allowed if the witness is against the lawyer or if they are being cross-examined by the opposing lawyer. A leading question is one that gives the answer in the question itself.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition:

  1. Verb: Short for "leading the witness." It refers to the act of an attorney during a trial or deposition asking questions in a way that puts words in the mouth of the witness or suggests the answer. This is considered improper if the attorney is questioning a witness called by that attorney and presumably friendly to the attorney's side of the case. If the opposing attorney objects that a question is "leading," the judge will uphold the objection and prohibit the question in that form. However, leading questions are permissible in cross-examination of a witness called by the other party or if the witness is found to be hostile or adverse to the position of the attorney conducting the questioning.
  2. Adjective: Referring to a question asked of a witness that suggests the answer.

Examples:

  • Verb: The defense attorney asked the witness, "Isn't it true that you saw my client at the scene of the crime?" This is an example of a leading question because it suggests the answer and puts words in the mouth of the witness.
  • Adjective: The prosecutor asked a leading question when he said, "You saw the defendant with the murder weapon, didn't you?" This question suggests the answer and is therefore leading.

These examples illustrate how leading questions can be improper and can influence the witness to give a certain answer. It is important for attorneys to avoid leading questions when questioning their own witnesses and to only use them in certain circumstances during cross-examination or with hostile witnesses.

law book | leading the witness

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.