Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

life insurance

Read a random definition: liberam legem amittere

A quick definition of life insurance:

Life insurance is an agreement between you and an insurance company. You pay the company money (called a premium) and if you die, the company will give a certain amount of money to someone you choose (called a beneficiary). It's like a promise that the company will take care of your loved ones if something happens to you. It's important to have life insurance so that your family can be financially secure even if you're not there to take care of them.

A more thorough explanation:

Life insurance is a type of contract between an individual and an insurance company. The contract promises that if the individual dies, the insurance company will pay a certain amount of money to a person that the individual has chosen. This person is called the beneficiary. The beneficiary will only receive the money if they survive the individual who has passed away. In exchange for this promise, the individual will pay the insurance company a fee called a premium.

For example, John buys a life insurance policy from XYZ Insurance Company. He designates his wife, Jane, as the beneficiary. John pays a monthly premium to the insurance company. If John dies while the policy is in effect, XYZ Insurance Company will pay Jane the amount of money specified in the policy.

Life insurance is considered a third-party beneficiary contract because the beneficiary is not a party to the agreement between the individual and the insurance company. It is also considered a type of will substitute because the assets are transferred to the beneficiary within the individual's lifetime.

life expectancy | life insurance avails

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.