Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

McNabb-Mallory Rule

Read a random definition: senior interest

A quick definition of McNabb-Mallory Rule:

McNabb-Mallory Rule: A rule that requires police officers to bring a defendant before a judge or judicial officer promptly after arrest and excludes any confessions or evidence produced by police officers during the time period between arrest and the defendant’s initial appearance hearing. This rule is meant to protect defendants from being forced to incriminate themselves and promotes fairness and efficiency in the legal process.

A more thorough explanation:

The McNabb-Mallory Rule is a legal principle that requires police officers to promptly present defendants before a judge or judicial officer after arrest and excludes any confessions or evidence produced by police officers during the time period between arrest and the defendant’s initial appearance hearing.

The purpose of the McNabb-Mallory rule is to protect defendants from being coerced into self-incrimination. By requiring authorities to bring a defendant before the magistrate without unnecessary delay, the rule promotes defendants’ and courts’ interests in due process, efficiency, and equity.

The McNabb-Mallory rule has been codified into Rule 5(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Most state penal codes have adopted Rule 5(a)’s mandate that defendants be brought before a magistrate judge without “unnecessary delay” (usually within 48-72 hours of arrest) – with delay measured as the entire duration of custody. If a defendant is brought into court late or is found to have produced confessions while in custody, they may have their suits dismissed on the basis of due process infringement.

For example, if a person is arrested for a crime, the police must bring them before a judge or magistrate within a reasonable amount of time. If they do not, any evidence or confession obtained during that time may be excluded from the trial. This protects the defendant's rights and ensures a fair trial.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) | McNaghten Rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.