Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

McNabb-Mallory Rule

Read a random definition: Bureau of Diplomatic Security

A quick definition of McNabb-Mallory Rule:

McNabb-Mallory Rule: A rule that requires police officers to bring a defendant before a judge or judicial officer promptly after arrest and excludes any confessions or evidence produced by police officers during the time period between arrest and the defendant’s initial appearance hearing. This rule is meant to protect defendants from being forced to incriminate themselves and promotes fairness and efficiency in the legal process.

A more thorough explanation:

The McNabb-Mallory Rule is a legal principle that requires police officers to promptly present defendants before a judge or judicial officer after arrest and excludes any confessions or evidence produced by police officers during the time period between arrest and the defendant’s initial appearance hearing.

The purpose of the McNabb-Mallory rule is to protect defendants from being coerced into self-incrimination. By requiring authorities to bring a defendant before the magistrate without unnecessary delay, the rule promotes defendants’ and courts’ interests in due process, efficiency, and equity.

The McNabb-Mallory rule has been codified into Rule 5(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Most state penal codes have adopted Rule 5(a)’s mandate that defendants be brought before a magistrate judge without “unnecessary delay” (usually within 48-72 hours of arrest) – with delay measured as the entire duration of custody. If a defendant is brought into court late or is found to have produced confessions while in custody, they may have their suits dismissed on the basis of due process infringement.

For example, if a person is arrested for a crime, the police must bring them before a judge or magistrate within a reasonable amount of time. If they do not, any evidence or confession obtained during that time may be excluded from the trial. This protects the defendant's rights and ensures a fair trial.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) | McNaghten Rule

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
12:34
gotchu
hello friends
13:09
Yo
lawguy we're nearly stats twins :D
13:13
I saw that, and I saw you got the Georgetown interview invite yesterday too! Goodluck!
you too haha, i was super surprised to have received one so early not gonna lie
i heard the group interview is really chill and I'm kinda excited to do it
seems cool
13:14
Yeah, 7sage has a page that talks about the questions for each schools interview, GULC's seems unique
13:15
Idk how much of an effect it has on admissions chances but should be cool either way
ive heard the conversion rate for gulc group interview is pretty high even moreso if you have the stats
it's hard to say but i've also heard that the group interview is harder to get than the alumni interview. but who really knows tbh
im p sure they don't interview everyone and getting one this early should be a great sign!
13:16
Yeah I've heard the same ab the group interview
13:17
So maybe I'll see you in D.C. a year from now lmao
initiallaw
13:32
Speaking of stat twins kazuyamishima were exact stat twins lol
17:13
Anyone going to the UGA zoom thing on the 22nd?
17:16
My bad, 24th*
Idk, what's it for?
@Law-Guy: How'd you get the Vandy fee waiver?
17:32
What does going ur3 in 3 days mean at Uva 😅
that you will get UR2 in 3 more
17:33
somethings gotta give
I’m new. What’s the UR and UR2?
17:35
I already went ur2. It’s the 3rd status date change
17:35
@RustyWrangler: attend one of their virtual info sessions and they'll send you a fee waiver
@Law-Guy: Awesome, thanks! I'll sign up rn!
i'm not entirely sure
They've recently been sending a lot of interview invites
It means status change?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.