Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

McNabb-Mallory Rule

Read a random definition: appellee

A quick definition of McNabb-Mallory Rule:

McNabb-Mallory Rule: A rule that requires police officers to bring a defendant before a judge or judicial officer promptly after arrest and excludes any confessions or evidence produced by police officers during the time period between arrest and the defendant’s initial appearance hearing. This rule is meant to protect defendants from being forced to incriminate themselves and promotes fairness and efficiency in the legal process.

A more thorough explanation:

The McNabb-Mallory Rule is a legal principle that requires police officers to promptly present defendants before a judge or judicial officer after arrest and excludes any confessions or evidence produced by police officers during the time period between arrest and the defendant’s initial appearance hearing.

The purpose of the McNabb-Mallory rule is to protect defendants from being coerced into self-incrimination. By requiring authorities to bring a defendant before the magistrate without unnecessary delay, the rule promotes defendants’ and courts’ interests in due process, efficiency, and equity.

The McNabb-Mallory rule has been codified into Rule 5(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Most state penal codes have adopted Rule 5(a)’s mandate that defendants be brought before a magistrate judge without “unnecessary delay” (usually within 48-72 hours of arrest) – with delay measured as the entire duration of custody. If a defendant is brought into court late or is found to have produced confessions while in custody, they may have their suits dismissed on the basis of due process infringement.

For example, if a person is arrested for a crime, the police must bring them before a judge or magistrate within a reasonable amount of time. If they do not, any evidence or confession obtained during that time may be excluded from the trial. This protects the defendant's rights and ensures a fair trial.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) | McNaghten Rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:15
sad. imagine being here in 2005/2010 when it was 100 operational. woe is me
@llama: back when 160s meant t14
14:16
born too late to experience full LSD born too soon to explore the galaxy
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
soyalmondoatmilk
14:18
vandy A let's gooooo
all the Vandy
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Aint no way
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
what
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
fuck
renard99
14:19
@soyalmondoatmilk: Congratulations!!!
jackfrost11770
14:19
I applied in November
jackfrost11770
14:19
Idk when the As did
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
does anyone know if they usually release all at once or waht
nothing
jackfrost11770
14:20
Well I hope not otherwise I'm screwed
jackfrost11770
14:21
Anderson cooper PLEASEEEEE
For ED and their last wave of decisions it was an email all at once
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:22
ugh
gonna go cry
jackfrost11770
14:22
Ugh
jackfrost11770
14:22
:(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.