Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Memorandum Decision

Read a random definition: attachiamenta bonorum

A quick definition of Memorandum Decision:

A memorandum decision is a short document written by a court that only tells you what the court decided in a case. It doesn't explain why the court made that decision. Memorandum decisions are not very important because they are not published or used as examples for future cases. However, in Arizona, lawyers can sometimes use them as examples if there are no other cases that talk about the same thing.

A more thorough explanation:

A Memorandum Decision is a document written by a court that only provides the outcome of the court's decision on a case. It is usually brief and does not include the court's reasoning or explanation for reaching the decision. Memorandum decisions are not published or binding precedents, so they cannot be cited in court. However, in some states, they can be used as persuasive authority under certain circumstances.

Suppose a court hears a case and decides that the defendant is guilty of a crime. The court may issue a Memorandum Decision that simply states "Defendant is found guilty." This decision does not explain how the court arrived at this conclusion or provide any legal reasoning. It is just a statement of the court's decision.

Another example could be a court hearing a case about a contract dispute. The court may issue a Memorandum Decision that states "Plaintiff is awarded damages in the amount of $10,000." This decision does not explain how the court calculated the damages or provide any legal analysis. It is just a statement of the court's decision.

These examples illustrate how a Memorandum Decision is a brief document that only provides the outcome of a court's decision without any legal reasoning or explanation.

Memorandum | Memorandum of Points and Authorities

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.