Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

mere-evidence rule

Read a random definition: equitable estoppel

A quick definition of mere-evidence rule:

The mere-evidence rule used to be a law that said police could only take things that were used to commit a crime or things that were stolen, but not things that just showed someone did something wrong. For example, they couldn't take a letter that proved someone was guilty. But now, the Supreme Court says police can take anything that shows someone did something wrong.

A more thorough explanation:

The mere-evidence rule is a former doctrine in criminal procedure that stated a search warrant only allowed the seizure of the instrumentalities or fruits of a crime, but not items that had evidentiary value only. For example, a search warrant could allow the seizure of a murder weapon or stolen goods, but not incriminating documents.

However, the Supreme Court has abolished this rule, and now warrants may be issued to search for and seize all evidence of a crime. This means that incriminating documents can now be seized with a search warrant.

For example, if a search warrant is issued for a suspect's home in a fraud investigation, the police can now seize not only any stolen money or equipment used in the fraud, but also any documents that may provide evidence of the fraud.

mere-continuation doctrine | mere license

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:12
@MrThickRopes: maybe they'll spoil us and it'll be 3:59 😊🤞🏻 You hear from Bama yet?
MrThickRopes
12:13
no
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
@MrThickRopes: That's alright! At least you
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
At least you
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
FUCK
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
At least you are still in the running
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
12:16
There! Got it! :)
MrThickRopes
12:19
Thank u
When will NYU release more As
Mostlylegal
12:53
I believe in fo pm, the great admissions team, maker of As and schollys.
Mostlylegal
12:54
And in mr thick ropes, their only son
[] c0bra1
13:00
do you have to get new recommendations if you reapply
[] c0bra1
13:00
or can you reuse one of them
180letmein
13:00
I think they say you can reuse recommendations
180letmein
13:00
Just make sure to let your recommenders know
[] c0bra1
13:00
gotcha
180letmein
13:00
That you're gonna use it again. But that's just courtesy
[] c0bra1
13:01
thinking about reapplying if i manage to get a yob in the next month or so
[] c0bra1
13:01
we'll see
babycakes
13:03
As an R&Rer i can tell you your recommendations stay in LSAC for like five years or something and you don’t have to re-request them
babycakes
13:04
And you don’t have to get new ones
babycakes
13:06
I am an R&R advocate if you know you can do better on the LSAT or write better essays or you just want more time to figure out what you’re doing with your life. Was a really good choice for me
ClassyPleasantHeron
13:07
You can re-use recommendations, but if you're reapplying and expecting different results, you should get at least one new/updated recommendation.
[] c0bra1
13:16
im maxed on lsat so id only reapply for a lucrative and decently protected job offer, at which point yeah id get a new recommendation from whoever i work for
[] c0bra1
13:16
i wish you didnt have to waive viewing rights to recommendations tbh i wanna know what they're sayin about me
[] c0bra1
13:17
i also heard that if you reapply somewhere you got accepted from originally they dont like it? or something? is that actually true or just speculation
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
13:21
I've heard that too---which is tough, because what if the only problem was funding? (Or in that case can you defer and try to renegotiate scholarship or something?)
[] c0bra1
13:24
yeahh and i don't know how picky schools are about the deferment reason - idk if "i want to work so i can make money and come back later" is an approved reason lol
[] c0bra1
13:24
and even then its 1 year at max
[] c0bra1
13:24
well at least i have a month and a half to think about it
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.