Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no-fault insurance

Read a random definition: surtax

A quick definition of no-fault insurance:

No-fault insurance is a type of car insurance that helps pay for certain losses after a car accident, no matter who caused the accident. The policyholder, their insurance company, and the other parties involved in the accident are the three main players in this system. The insurance company covers the policyholder's losses, which can include medical fees, lost wages, and other expenses. In some states, policyholders can choose how much coverage they want. No-fault insurance also limits the ability of policyholders to sue for pain and suffering. Some states have variations on the no-fault system, such as add-on or choice no-fault.

A more thorough explanation:

No-fault insurance is a type of auto insurance that requires the insurance company to pay for certain losses resulting from a car accident, regardless of who caused the accident. There are three parties involved in the no-fault system: the policyholder, their insurance company, and the other party or parties involved in the accident.

The policyholder's insurance company must cover losses or first-party benefits, which can range from mandatory personal injury protection (PIP) to a comprehensive package that includes PIP, medical fees, lost wages, funeral costs, and other out-of-pocket expenses. For example, in Michigan, PIP payment is required for all reasonable and necessary medical expenses for the policyholder's lifetime. In New York, first-party PIP benefits include all reasonable and necessary medical and rehabilitation expenses related to the accident, 80% of lost wages, a maximum of $25 a day for a year after the date of the accident for other reasonable and necessary expenses related to the accident, and a $2,000 death benefit.

One characteristic of no-fault insurance is that policyholders are restricted by either a monetary threshold or a verbal threshold from suing third parties for tort compensation for pain and suffering. Monetary thresholds allow policyholders to file lawsuits when their medical expenses meet a statutory amount. Verbal thresholds allow policyholders to file lawsuits when their injuries satisfy the criteria for serious bodily injuries.

Variations on the no-fault system include add-on and choice no-fault. Add-on systems, like Oregon, have no-fault systems' first-party benefits without its restrictions on lawsuits. Choice no-fault systems, like Kentucky, allow policyholders to elect either no-fault or tort liability.

For example, if a driver in Michigan is in an accident, their insurance company will pay for their medical expenses for the rest of their life, regardless of who caused the accident. However, the driver cannot sue the other driver for pain and suffering unless their medical expenses exceed a certain amount. In New York, if a driver is in an accident, their insurance company will pay for their medical expenses, lost wages, and other related expenses, but they cannot sue the other driver for pain and suffering unless they have a serious bodily injury.

no-fault divorce | No-Knock Warrant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.