Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no-fault insurance

Read a random definition: doctrine of precedent

A quick definition of no-fault insurance:

No-fault insurance is a type of car insurance that helps pay for certain losses after a car accident, no matter who caused the accident. The policyholder, their insurance company, and the other parties involved in the accident are the three main players in this system. The insurance company covers the policyholder's losses, which can include medical fees, lost wages, and other expenses. In some states, policyholders can choose how much coverage they want. No-fault insurance also limits the ability of policyholders to sue for pain and suffering. Some states have variations on the no-fault system, such as add-on or choice no-fault.

A more thorough explanation:

No-fault insurance is a type of auto insurance that requires the insurance company to pay for certain losses resulting from a car accident, regardless of who caused the accident. There are three parties involved in the no-fault system: the policyholder, their insurance company, and the other party or parties involved in the accident.

The policyholder's insurance company must cover losses or first-party benefits, which can range from mandatory personal injury protection (PIP) to a comprehensive package that includes PIP, medical fees, lost wages, funeral costs, and other out-of-pocket expenses. For example, in Michigan, PIP payment is required for all reasonable and necessary medical expenses for the policyholder's lifetime. In New York, first-party PIP benefits include all reasonable and necessary medical and rehabilitation expenses related to the accident, 80% of lost wages, a maximum of $25 a day for a year after the date of the accident for other reasonable and necessary expenses related to the accident, and a $2,000 death benefit.

One characteristic of no-fault insurance is that policyholders are restricted by either a monetary threshold or a verbal threshold from suing third parties for tort compensation for pain and suffering. Monetary thresholds allow policyholders to file lawsuits when their medical expenses meet a statutory amount. Verbal thresholds allow policyholders to file lawsuits when their injuries satisfy the criteria for serious bodily injuries.

Variations on the no-fault system include add-on and choice no-fault. Add-on systems, like Oregon, have no-fault systems' first-party benefits without its restrictions on lawsuits. Choice no-fault systems, like Kentucky, allow policyholders to elect either no-fault or tort liability.

For example, if a driver in Michigan is in an accident, their insurance company will pay for their medical expenses for the rest of their life, regardless of who caused the accident. However, the driver cannot sue the other driver for pain and suffering unless their medical expenses exceed a certain amount. In New York, if a driver is in an accident, their insurance company will pay for their medical expenses, lost wages, and other related expenses, but they cannot sue the other driver for pain and suffering unless they have a serious bodily injury.

no-fault divorce | No-Knock Warrant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
babycakes
8:49
Was talking to a dude who works at an indie bookstore the other day he said he makes $30 an hour!!
babycakes
8:50
Way better than I’m doing
ClassyPleasantHeron
9:14
Did you tell him that he could 2.5x his wages by being a 75k/year janitor, and get more respect?
ClassyPleasantHeron
9:14
1.25x, but you know what I mean. Might as well inflate the numbers. :D
Mostlylegal
9:18
Hey man thats a respectable thing to do, dont be a classist for discounting inflation, its personally my favorite subreddit
Chitoba
9:37
GULC evening program y u no answer meeeee (2/16 app)
10:07
@babycakes: maybe he can fly you out someday
10:08
i need a bad bleep ADDISON RAE
[] c0bra1
10:10
i need an A
globalcitizen
10:14
Are we gonna do something about the mentally ill alcoholic veterans collecting 100% disability for fake ailments
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:15
baby im a dog im a mutt
globalcitizen
10:15
Major drain on the American taxpayer
Mostlylegal
10:23
I need AA
are u allowed to work ur 1L?
[] c0bra1
10:42
depends on the school
[] c0bra1
10:42
most will either say no or say part time no more than x number of hours
10:51
Howard is ranked number 13 for big law
10:52
this is huge news
babycakes
11:01
i don’t think getting flown out is in the cards for me
[] c0bra1
11:03
im going crazy i think
Anyone get an email from LSAC that an app status changed but nothing changed? Talk about blue balls
11:06
that happens all the time
Anyone apply for Weil legal innovators and gotten their round 2 interview invite?
Bastards…
180letmein
11:08
@dirtyquackyak: congrats!
UnevenInstinctiveSeal
11:17
Is it weird to send an LOCI before getting a decision if its been months and most people who applied around the same time have heard back?
W&M wave
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:23
@UnevenInstinctiveSeal: yeah, typically schools prefer only to hear from you pre-decision if you have big updates to share
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:24
LOCI is intended to help them choose off the waitlist efficiently to fill any remaining spots in their class; they don't want to waste time and energy calling someone who isn't ready to drop everything and attend
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:27
What school?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.