Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Noerr–Pennington doctrine

Read a random definition: special reprisal

A quick definition of Noerr–Pennington doctrine:

The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a rule that says companies can't get in trouble for working together to talk to the government. This means that if a group of companies wants to ask the government to change a law, they can do it without worrying about getting in trouble for breaking antitrust laws. The rule comes from two court cases, and it's based on the idea that the First Amendment protects people's right to talk to the government about what they think is important.

A more thorough explanation:

The Noerr–Pennington doctrine is a principle that protects companies from legal liability, especially under antitrust laws, when they join together to lobby the government. This principle is based on a series of Supreme Court cases, including Eastern R.R. Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. and United Mine Workers v. Pennington.

For example, if two competing companies in the same industry join together to lobby the government for a change in regulations that would benefit their industry, they would be protected by the Noerr–Pennington doctrine. Even though their actions may have anti-competitive effects, they are shielded from legal liability because they are exercising their First Amendment right to petition the government.

Another example could be a group of farmers lobbying the government for subsidies or tax breaks. Even though these actions may benefit the farmers at the expense of taxpayers, they are protected by the Noerr–Pennington doctrine because they are exercising their right to petition the government.

These examples illustrate how the Noerr–Pennington doctrine protects companies and individuals from legal liability when they engage in lobbying activities. It is important to note that this doctrine only applies to lobbying activities and does not protect companies from liability for other anti-competitive behavior, such as price-fixing or market allocation.

no-duty doctrine | no evidence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.