Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Noerr–Pennington doctrine

Read a random definition: ACP

A quick definition of Noerr–Pennington doctrine:

The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a rule that says companies can't get in trouble for working together to talk to the government. This means that if a group of companies wants to ask the government to change a law, they can do it without worrying about getting in trouble for breaking antitrust laws. The rule comes from two court cases, and it's based on the idea that the First Amendment protects people's right to talk to the government about what they think is important.

A more thorough explanation:

The Noerr–Pennington doctrine is a principle that protects companies from legal liability, especially under antitrust laws, when they join together to lobby the government. This principle is based on a series of Supreme Court cases, including Eastern R.R. Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. and United Mine Workers v. Pennington.

For example, if two competing companies in the same industry join together to lobby the government for a change in regulations that would benefit their industry, they would be protected by the Noerr–Pennington doctrine. Even though their actions may have anti-competitive effects, they are shielded from legal liability because they are exercising their First Amendment right to petition the government.

Another example could be a group of farmers lobbying the government for subsidies or tax breaks. Even though these actions may benefit the farmers at the expense of taxpayers, they are protected by the Noerr–Pennington doctrine because they are exercising their right to petition the government.

These examples illustrate how the Noerr–Pennington doctrine protects companies and individuals from legal liability when they engage in lobbying activities. It is important to note that this doctrine only applies to lobbying activities and does not protect companies from liability for other anti-competitive behavior, such as price-fixing or market allocation.

no-duty doctrine | no evidence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
windyMagician
11:09
shaq hows ur love life going? any updates?
shaquilleoatmeal
11:14
damn couldnt even get to Christmas dinner before this question lmao im not looking for anything serious rn so no updates lol
11:14
i made out with my ex in a stairwell the other day if you care. my only update
shaquilleoatmeal
11:14
oof
shaquilleoatmeal
11:14
twitter ex or a different ex
11:15
different ex
windyMagician
11:15
since its not Twitter dude I'll forgive it
shaquilleoatmeal
11:17
at least you did that before the new year, cant carry that baggage in 25
11:17
I think he thinks if I move to nyc we’re going to get back together
11:17
that’s not my plan tbh
jackfrost11770
11:18
this is so funny
shaquilleoatmeal
11:19
lmao damn wish id be classmates with this dude
shaquilleoatmeal
11:20
@cheriebomb: you never know what the future holds
jackfrost11770
11:20
also cherie fallen soldier
jackfrost11770
11:20
i got home at 8 am from the club and my neighbor was leaving to go biking. truly living in different worlds
11:20
i don’t fw him that heavy tbh
11:21
i get along better with his friends than i do with him
windyMagician
11:21
nah the hiking in Nike blazers deserves jail time
11:21
he was already vomiting and shitting in a hole I think he did his penance
windyMagician
11:26
call that restorative justice
11:35
they put a place in the UK second. I don’t trust their methodology
shaquilleoatmeal
11:35
im laughin cause it definitely isnt but the fact that some people this it is is comical
shaquilleoatmeal
11:35
tink*
shaquilleoatmeal
11:35
think jee
shaquilleoatmeal
11:35
jeez - im over it
11:37
imagine saying you want to go to boston for christmas 💀
shaquilleoatmeal
11:40
imagine you not wanting to go what lmao
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.