Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Noerr–Pennington doctrine

Read a random definition: words of procreation

A quick definition of Noerr–Pennington doctrine:

The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a rule that says companies can't get in trouble for working together to talk to the government. This means that if a group of companies wants to ask the government to change a law, they can do it without worrying about getting in trouble for breaking antitrust laws. The rule comes from two court cases, and it's based on the idea that the First Amendment protects people's right to talk to the government about what they think is important.

A more thorough explanation:

The Noerr–Pennington doctrine is a principle that protects companies from legal liability, especially under antitrust laws, when they join together to lobby the government. This principle is based on a series of Supreme Court cases, including Eastern R.R. Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. and United Mine Workers v. Pennington.

For example, if two competing companies in the same industry join together to lobby the government for a change in regulations that would benefit their industry, they would be protected by the Noerr–Pennington doctrine. Even though their actions may have anti-competitive effects, they are shielded from legal liability because they are exercising their First Amendment right to petition the government.

Another example could be a group of farmers lobbying the government for subsidies or tax breaks. Even though these actions may benefit the farmers at the expense of taxpayers, they are protected by the Noerr–Pennington doctrine because they are exercising their right to petition the government.

These examples illustrate how the Noerr–Pennington doctrine protects companies and individuals from legal liability when they engage in lobbying activities. It is important to note that this doctrine only applies to lobbying activities and does not protect companies from liability for other anti-competitive behavior, such as price-fixing or market allocation.

no-duty doctrine | no evidence

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
[] ararara
16:53
@pookiebear: CONGRATS GW IS HUGE
amlaw
16:55
that’s cool bunny
16:58
yeah idk if my ex shows up i will cry or punch someone
amlaw
17:00
risky
why not both
amlaw
17:00
well i don’t encourage violence but if you feel the need to punch someone hopefully it’s him
s95
17:01
hi this doesnt seem like the place to ask this but does anyone know any law schools that are good for a future specialization in immigration law?
babybunny
17:01
they live like two hours away from me and I think the friend decided to do this show specifically to see me which is a whole other can of worms
amlaw
17:02
ooh this is like a romance book
[] ararara
17:04
@s95: My cousin is an immigration attorney who recently argued in front of the supreme court. He attended the University of Houston for law school. There are so many good schools for immigration law, countless clinics.
[] ararara
17:05
@s95: The higher the rank though basically means more opportunities possibly with a debt trade off. It's hard for me to say more without knowing your goals though. Awesome you already have an idea what you want to do as a lawyer!
[] ararara
17:06
I would research immigration law clinics
@s95: generally school specialties are kind of silly. it’s usually the rank of the school that determines the opportunities you can get from it across the board
with caveats for strong regional schools with a regional focus and so on
17:27
@s95 University of San Diego
twinkletwinklestar
22:47
@dkkm10: nice diss
23:32
Ahh well I kinda meant that seriously given I know 3 attorneys who went there and they did immigration law afterwards.
23:33
They have a really strong immigration clinic too.
Happy fourth of july future lawyers !! :)
USD actually does really well for immigration in the SoCal region, and is known to have a great clinic.
11:47
Just graduated law school, studying for the bar exam now, came back to wish you all a happy 4th and good luck in the fall!!!
manifestmoreadmissions
11:56
congrats!!
ThiagoSplitter2024
16:07
Hey
ThiagoSplitter2024
16:08
Do y'all think adcoms are working tomorrow? Curious about emailing a school I am admitted into
My friend goes to USD
I know professors there. They are uber nice and smart
manifestmoreadmissions
16:54
@ThiagoSplitter2024: i think it's probably on a school-by-school basis. like if that school is open then their admissions office probably is
how cooked is a 3.65 and 174 from an ivy for t14
CamoCat
18:42
you are fine....
19:47
Assuming decent softs/essays/recs, a 3.65/174 will get you into whichever T14s (maybe even T6s) need to defend their LSAT median
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.