Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

nonliteral infringement

Read a random definition: failure-to-disclose-best-mode rejection

A quick definition of nonliteral infringement:

Nonliteral infringement is a legal theory used in patent cases to find infringement when the accused product or process is not exactly the same as the patented invention. This doctrine was created to prevent parties from avoiding liability for patent infringement by making small changes to the product or process. To determine if infringement exists, the court must first determine if the accused product or process contains an element identical or equivalent to each claimed element of the patented invention. If it does, it infringes on the patent if the differing element performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to get the same result as the patented product or process.

A more thorough explanation:

Nonliteral infringement is a legal theory used in patent law to find infringement when the accused product or process falls outside the literal scope of the patent claims. This theory was created to prevent parties from avoiding liability for patent infringement by making trivial changes to the product or process to avoid the literal language of the patent claims.

For example, if a patent claims a device with a specific element, and another company creates a device without that exact element but with an equivalent element that performs the same function in the same way to achieve the same result, it may still be considered infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.

The doctrine of equivalents is not an absolute bar to a patentee who seeks to invoke it to prove infringement on a claim that was voluntarily amended. However, prosecution-history estoppel may limit the scope of the doctrine.

Overall, nonliteral infringement is a way to protect patent holders from infringers who try to make minor changes to avoid liability.

nonliquidating distribution | nonmailable

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.