Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

predominant-aspect test

Read a random definition: acquest

A quick definition of predominant-aspect test:

A predominant-aspect test is a way to determine if a transaction falls under Article 2 of the UCC, which deals with the sale of goods. This test looks at the main aspect of the exchange and considers whether it is primarily the sale of goods or services. If goods make up most of the value, it is likely a sale, but if services are the main aspect, it probably is not. The Bonebrake v. Cox case is a leading example of this test.

A more thorough explanation:

The predominant-aspect test is a method used to determine whether Article 2 of the UCC applies to an exchange. It is also known as the predominant-purpose test.

This test involves assessing whether the exchange's main aspect, viewed in light of all the circumstances, is the sale of goods. If goods account for most of the exchange's value, it is likely a sale. If services account for most of the value, it probably is not.

For example, if a person buys a car from a dealership, the predominant aspect of the exchange is the sale of goods. However, if a person hires a plumber to fix a leaky faucet, the predominant aspect of the exchange is the provision of services.

The leading case for the predominant-aspect test is Bonebrake v. Cox, 499 F.2d 951, 960 (8th Cir. 1974).

predisposition | predominant-purpose test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.