Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

predominant-purpose test

Read a random definition: parody

A quick definition of predominant-purpose test:

A predominant-purpose test is a way to determine if a transaction falls under Article 2 of the UCC, which deals with the sale of goods. This test looks at the main aspect of the exchange and considers if it is primarily the sale of goods or services. If goods make up most of the value, it is likely a sale, but if services are the main aspect, it probably is not. The Bonebrake v. Cox case is a leading example of this test.

A more thorough explanation:

The predominant-purpose test is a way to determine if a transaction falls under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). This test looks at the main purpose of the transaction and considers if it involves the sale of goods.

For example, if a person buys a car from a dealership, the predominant-purpose of the transaction is the sale of goods. However, if a person hires a mechanic to fix their car, the predominant-purpose of the transaction is the provision of services.

The Bonebrake v. Cox case is a leading example of the predominant-purpose test. In this case, the court determined that a contract for the sale of a combine was primarily a sale of goods, even though it included some services.

Overall, the predominant-purpose test is used to determine if a transaction falls under Article 2 of the UCC, which governs the sale of goods.

predominant-aspect test | preemption claimant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.