Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

predominant-purpose test

Read a random definition: cybercrime

A quick definition of predominant-purpose test:

A predominant-purpose test is a way to determine if a transaction falls under Article 2 of the UCC, which deals with the sale of goods. This test looks at the main aspect of the exchange and considers if it is primarily the sale of goods or services. If goods make up most of the value, it is likely a sale, but if services are the main aspect, it probably is not. The Bonebrake v. Cox case is a leading example of this test.

A more thorough explanation:

The predominant-purpose test is a way to determine if a transaction falls under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). This test looks at the main purpose of the transaction and considers if it involves the sale of goods.

For example, if a person buys a car from a dealership, the predominant-purpose of the transaction is the sale of goods. However, if a person hires a mechanic to fix their car, the predominant-purpose of the transaction is the provision of services.

The Bonebrake v. Cox case is a leading example of the predominant-purpose test. In this case, the court determined that a contract for the sale of a combine was primarily a sale of goods, even though it included some services.

Overall, the predominant-purpose test is used to determine if a transaction falls under Article 2 of the UCC, which governs the sale of goods.

predominant-aspect test | preemption claimant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:34
I mean if Fordham doesn't release today I will purposefully get on a train, go to new york, and then take the stinkiest shit inside the admission office's toilet (potentially clogging it and forcing them to get a plumber)
IS IT ONLY ON MY END WHY DID THAT SEND TEN MILLION TIMES
HELLO
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
it sent a million times lol
WHAT HAPPENED
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
election day psychosis coming in hot (fordham)
usc pls pull through .....
i literally just need one A so i can relax before my ED decision
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:38
oh that's right USC might release
soapy
9:43
USC still has not looked at my app
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:43
when did you submit soapy?
soapy
9:44
10/16
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:44
to be fair it took them almost 2 months for me to go under review
soapy
9:44
Feelin a bit stressed, as I've got no date change for Michigan either despite applying 10/7
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:45
I have not had a date change either for Mich but I've seen people get in without one so who knows
I applied 9/25 to like 6 schools and some (Houston) have no date change yet so dw
soapy
9:46
But do people get in without addresses going long?
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:46
it's tough to tell because a lot of people type out their addresses long to begin with
soapy
9:46
Ah. I didn't. Looking back, my Mich supplement kind of sucks, so there's that
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.