Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Provisional patent application (PPA)

Read a random definition: full-reporting clause

A quick definition of Provisional patent application (PPA):

A provisional patent application (PPA) is a way for inventors to establish an early filing date for their invention before the formal patent claim is ready. It allows the inventor to file without a formal patent claim or oath, but they must provide a detailed written description of the invention. The PPA has a 12-month pendency period, during which the inventor must file a nonprovisional application to keep the earlier filing date. If they fail to file within 12 months, they lose the earlier filing date. The PPA is not made public unless the nonprovisional application is approved and published. Filing a PPA can give the inventor an earlier patenting date, but it also shortens the patent's protection period.

A more thorough explanation:

A provisional patent application (PPA) is a type of patent application that an inventor can file before the formal patent claim is ready. It allows the inventor to establish an early effective filing date in a later filed nonprovisional patent application. This means that the inventor can secure the patent rights to their invention before anyone else does.

For example, let's say that John has invented a new type of phone case. He wants to protect his invention, but he's not ready to file a formal patent claim yet. He can file a PPA to establish an early filing date. This means that if anyone else tries to patent a similar invention after John files his PPA, John's invention will have priority.

A PPA is regulated under Title 35 of U.S.C. §111(b). It does not require a formal patent claim or an oath or declaration. However, the inventor must meet certain requirements, including a written description of the invention that provides enough detail for someone with ordinary skills in the art to make and use the invention.

The most important feature of the PPA is the 12-month pendency period. Once a PPA is filed, the inventor has 12 months to file the nonprovisional application. If the inventor fails to file the nonprovisional application within 12 months of the PPA’s filing date, they lose the earlier filing date given by the PPA. A nonprovisional application filed after 12 months, but within 14 months of the PPA filing date may file an application to restore the PPA date.

A PPA benefits an inventor by allowing them to get an earlier patenting date, which can preempt any other patents or public disclosure after the PPA filing date. However, a PPA also effectively shortens the patent’s protection period. A granted patent is usually protected for 20 years from the date the patent is filed. By filing a PPA, the patent is protected from the date the PPA is filed.

provisional ballot | Provisional Remedies

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
18:03
@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA
Super big congrats irish!!!
Also pretty much agree with Wasp. I think it’s more about getting the political/judicial position as a Fedsoc member that will likely require a stance siding with whatever the conservative majority party is at that time.
texaslawhopefully
18:07
Yeah, that's fair. I guess I need to think about it more assuming I start law school in the fall. I really want to clerk and that seems like the best option.
BUT i think once you get the position, you’ll have more leeway in making decisions more liberally. Sort of like how ACB and Gorsuch sometimes swing left after being portreayed in the media as far right (not sure if that was actually the case though).
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.