Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quick condemnation

Read a random definition: UPL

A quick definition of quick condemnation:

Quick condemnation is when the government takes someone's property for public use without waiting for a long legal process. They pay the owner an estimated amount of money and then figure out the actual amount later. It can also mean when a building or food is declared unfit for use by an official. In maritime law, it means a ship is taken by the government or declared unfit for service.

A more thorough explanation:

Quick condemnation is a legal term that refers to the immediate taking of private property for public use. This means that the government can take possession of someone's property without waiting for a lengthy legal process to play out. The estimated compensation for the property is deposited in court or paid to the owner until the actual amount of compensation can be established. This process is also known as quick-take.

For example, if the government needs to build a new highway and the proposed route goes through someone's property, they may use quick condemnation to take possession of the land quickly. The owner would receive compensation for the property, but the legal process would be expedited to avoid delays in the construction of the highway.

Quick condemnation is often used in cases where time is of the essence, such as in emergency situations or when public safety is at risk. However, it is important to note that property owners still have legal rights and can challenge the government's decision to take their property.

quick-asset ratio | quick dispatch

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
its rather limited but its not nothing
17:18
@HopefullyInLawSchool: noted, thanks for the intel. I know we joke around but all things conidered, KS is goated
Dkk
17:18
@BigStrongBug: Nah aristotle only applies gender as a role which I think either sex could fulfill. My issue with Trump's EO to limit things to only sex but I am fine with him doing it for now.
Yeah and Aristotle old as hell boy he would’ve died of hysteria after learning what the internet and tiktok is
Dkk
17:19
@SplitterusClitterus: I think some school shootings could have been prevented if gender relations were better.
Very few of any,, none come to my mind tbh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.