Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

rational-purpose test

Read a random definition: intended parent

A quick definition of rational-purpose test:

A rational-purpose test is a way for judges to decide if a law is fair. If a law does not affect an important right or group of people, the court will only strike it down if it has no good reason to exist. This is the easiest test for a law to pass, and it is called "rational basis." The court will only use stricter tests if the law affects important rights or groups of people.

A more thorough explanation:

Rational-Purpose Test

The rational-purpose test is a criterion used by courts to analyze a statute that does not involve a fundamental right or a suspect classification under the Due Process or Equal Protection Clause. The court will uphold a law if it has a reasonable relationship to achieving a legitimate government objective. This is the most lenient standard of review used in due-process and equal-protection analysis.

  • A city ordinance that requires all dogs to be on a leash when in public places. The legitimate government objective is to ensure public safety and prevent dog attacks. The ordinance has a reasonable relationship to achieving this objective, so it would pass the rational-purpose test.
  • A state law that requires all individuals to obtain a license before operating a motor vehicle. The legitimate government objective is to ensure that drivers are qualified and competent to operate a vehicle. The law has a reasonable relationship to achieving this objective, so it would pass the rational-purpose test.

These examples illustrate how the rational-purpose test is used to determine whether a law is constitutional. If a law has a legitimate government objective and a reasonable relationship to achieving that objective, it will likely be upheld by the court.

rational interpretation | rational-relationship test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.