Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

runaway grand jury

Read a random definition: patent agent

A quick definition of runaway grand jury:

A runaway grand jury is a group of people who are chosen to sit permanently for at least a month and decide whether to issue indictments. Their primary function is to screen evidence and determine whether to charge someone with a crime. However, a runaway grand jury acts in opposition to the prosecution and may perversely fail to return an indictment that the prosecution has requested.

A more thorough explanation:

A runaway grand jury is a type of grand jury that acts against the prosecution. A grand jury is a group of people, usually 23, who decide whether to issue indictments in ex parte proceedings. They sit permanently for at least a month and sometimes up to a year. If the grand jury decides that there is enough evidence to hold a suspect for trial, it returns a bill of indictment charging the suspect with a specific crime.

However, a runaway grand jury acts perversely by failing to return an indictment that the prosecution has requested. This means that the grand jury is essentially opposing the prosecution and not fulfilling its duty to evaluate evidence and issue indictments when necessary.

For example, if a prosecutor presents strong evidence to a grand jury that a suspect committed a crime, but the grand jury refuses to issue an indictment, it could be considered a runaway grand jury.

Overall, a runaway grand jury is a rare occurrence, but it can happen when the grand jury members have biases or are influenced by external factors.

runaway | runner

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
23:12
Windy wya
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.