Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

search and seizure

Read a random definition: cum omni causa

A quick definition of search and seizure:

Search and seizure is when police officers look through someone's property, like their home or car, to find evidence that a crime has been committed. They are only allowed to do this if they have a good reason to believe a crime has happened. If they find something important, they can take it with them. The law says that searches and seizures have to be fair and reasonable. Usually, the police need permission from a judge to search someone's property, but sometimes they can do it without permission if there is an emergency.

A more thorough explanation:

Search and seizure is a legal term used to describe when law enforcement officers search a person's property, such as their home, vehicle, or business, to find evidence of a crime. During a search, officers look for specific items that are related to a crime they believe has been committed. If they find something, they may take possession of it, which is called a seizure.

The Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution require that any search or seizure must be reasonable. Normally, officers must obtain a search warrant from a judge, which specifies where and whom they may search and what they may seize. However, in emergency situations, officers may not need a warrant.

Here are some examples of search and seizure:

  • A police officer pulls over a car for speeding and smells marijuana. The officer searches the car and finds drugs, which are seized as evidence.
  • During a drug investigation, officers obtain a warrant to search a suspect's home. They find drugs and weapons, which are seized as evidence.
  • After a robbery, officers stop a person who matches the suspect's description. They search the person and find stolen items, which are seized as evidence.

These examples illustrate how officers may search and seize property to find evidence of a crime. In each case, the officers had reason to believe that a crime had been committed and followed the proper legal procedures to conduct the search and seizure.

Sealing of records | search warrant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.