Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Securities dispute resolution: Experts

Read a random definition: primary obligation

A quick definition of Securities dispute resolution: Experts:

Experts are people who can give their opinions on different issues related to securities disputes. They can help explain complex transactions and provide information to support claims made by either the person making the claim or the person defending against the claim. The decision to hire an expert depends on factors like the type of claim being made and the cost of the expert compared to the amount of money being claimed. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has rules related to experts, including allowing the arbitration panel to decide whether to allow an expert witness to testify. Once an expert witness is allowed to testify, the party that called the expert asks questions to the expert through a direct examination, and the opposing party may question the expert through a cross-examination. The arbitrators may also question the expert.

A more thorough explanation:

Experts are individuals who can provide their opinions on various issues related to securities disputes. They can offer necessary information to support claims made by either the claimant or the respondent. Experts can help explain complex transactions and provide expert testimony to support a party's case.

For example, in a securities dispute, an expert may be hired to provide an opinion on the management of an account or the calculation of profits. The decision to hire an expert depends on several factors, such as the type of claim or defense being made, the cost of the expert compared to the amount claimed as damages, and the need for expert testimony compared to background information.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) provides rules related to experts in securities disputes. These rules include:

  • Rule 9263, which authorizes the Hearing Officer to exclude irrelevant, immaterial, unduly repetitious, or unduly prejudicial evidence, including expert testimony.
  • Rule 9242(a), which authorizes the Hearing Officer to order a party to provide an expert's qualification statements, publications, and involvement in other proceedings.
  • Rule 9242(b), which prohibits a former officer of FINRA from testifying within a year of leaving FINRA.
  • Rule 12602 (for customer disputes) and Rule 13602 (for industry disputes), which permit expert witnesses to attend all hearings absent persuasive reasons to the contrary.

The arbitration panel determines whether to allow an expert witness to testify. The standards used in litigation provide a helpful guide. Federal courts may allow expert witnesses to testify if their knowledge helps the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data, the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and the witness has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case. State courts may impose different rules. Arbitrators are not bound by either federal or state standards in evaluating the expert.

Once an expert witness is permitted to testify in arbitration, the party that called the expert asks questions to the expert through a direct examination. The opposing party may question the expert through a cross-examination. The arbitrators may also question the expert.

Securities dispute resolution: Enforcing awards | Securities dispute resolution: Filing a complaint

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
i'm guessing maybe around 30ish more As then?
if we're being generous
11ama
20:27
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: Mostly using https://www.lsd.law/download and the 509 repots
11ama
20:28
reeeeeeports*
fml i'm a november applicant that still hasn't heard back
do we know if there are date changes for Rs too? for umich
how come i haven’t heard from some schools w high acceptance rates? what are they up to? like nebraska hasn’t been releasing decisions
is washu done sending out decisions? they just completely ghosted me
11ama
20:33
@SuperficialBlueWeasel: The reality is you are likely behind a gaggle of Sept-Oct. applicants. THe schools are backed up with apps. Some are fast, others are really slow. Also some schools may have had adcoms retire/ shortage of cannonfadder app readers. Try to chill out/research the schools you have applied to so when you get an answer you can move quick and lock up a deal/
thanks @11ama
11ama
20:34
In the event you have not received an admissions decision yet, have you tried turning your computer on and off, have you tried checking your span, and have you ensured your email inbox is not full?
OlDirtyBtard
20:34
I used to come on here and troll people and now I got my first R's and I no longer have a sense of humor
11ama
20:36
I was interested in applying to 'Bama law. Called them up, asked if they had any distant cousins attending their institution based on family name/ Ancestry.con DNA. They did not. I replied I was regrettably no longer interested in their institution.
Are you sure you ever did
OlDirtyBtard
20:36
all i'm saying is, i would debase myself to dean cooper for a cornell A
11ama
20:37
@OlDirtyBtard: Being an asshole is not sufficient for being funny, Unc.
11ama
20:37
Trust me, I tried it many a times b4/
20:39
I wonder if schools are punishing R&R's with no increases to GPA or LSAT.
20:40
Or no new work experience.
20:40
Last cycle people who are too burnt to go get something impressive to add to their resume and application.
11ama
21:00
@JuicyApple: Oh no doubt. Wouldn't you be perturbed if you rejected someone and they came back next year with a 'hey boo, its me again' ?
fedclerkhopeful
21:02
Yeah that’s def a real fear. I think too it puts people who have high stats but are going to reapply in a weird place because you can’t even improve the most important parts of your app
11ama
21:03
I'm sure it falls in the same category as retaking the LSAT: one more thing to be held against you.
21:05
Alrighty then. Sounds bad.
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
nah tbh just reapp to make them say no
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
advance out of spite alone
11ama
21:17
Pretty crazy sheer number of applicants, IMO. I hope people find fulfilling work, yet I fear the future will not reveal said state of affairs since movies/culture makes law seem much more bad ass than it is.
11ama
21:18
Law = paper pusher maxxing, prove me wrong;
21:40
Yeah, idk. I have been here like almost over a year now and I don't understand why half the people I meet go to law school. I was shadowing classes yesterday and today and the people I talked to in those 1L classes were like totally disinterested in the subject, getting questions wrong I knew as a paralegal, and didn't have any idea what they wanted to do post grad. Blew my mind. Maybe it's cus I shadowed a lower ranking scholl yesterday and today but it's weird.
21:41
Law school I fear is becoming just like another idk what I want to do post undergrad option and I need more time to find out so I am going to go to school some more which is like the opposite of what people should do.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.