Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Securities dispute resolution: Experts

Read a random definition: contubernium

A quick definition of Securities dispute resolution: Experts:

Experts are people who can give their opinions on different issues related to securities disputes. They can help explain complex transactions and provide information to support claims made by either the person making the claim or the person defending against the claim. The decision to hire an expert depends on factors like the type of claim being made and the cost of the expert compared to the amount of money being claimed. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has rules related to experts, including allowing the arbitration panel to decide whether to allow an expert witness to testify. Once an expert witness is allowed to testify, the party that called the expert asks questions to the expert through a direct examination, and the opposing party may question the expert through a cross-examination. The arbitrators may also question the expert.

A more thorough explanation:

Experts are individuals who can provide their opinions on various issues related to securities disputes. They can offer necessary information to support claims made by either the claimant or the respondent. Experts can help explain complex transactions and provide expert testimony to support a party's case.

For example, in a securities dispute, an expert may be hired to provide an opinion on the management of an account or the calculation of profits. The decision to hire an expert depends on several factors, such as the type of claim or defense being made, the cost of the expert compared to the amount claimed as damages, and the need for expert testimony compared to background information.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) provides rules related to experts in securities disputes. These rules include:

  • Rule 9263, which authorizes the Hearing Officer to exclude irrelevant, immaterial, unduly repetitious, or unduly prejudicial evidence, including expert testimony.
  • Rule 9242(a), which authorizes the Hearing Officer to order a party to provide an expert's qualification statements, publications, and involvement in other proceedings.
  • Rule 9242(b), which prohibits a former officer of FINRA from testifying within a year of leaving FINRA.
  • Rule 12602 (for customer disputes) and Rule 13602 (for industry disputes), which permit expert witnesses to attend all hearings absent persuasive reasons to the contrary.

The arbitration panel determines whether to allow an expert witness to testify. The standards used in litigation provide a helpful guide. Federal courts may allow expert witnesses to testify if their knowledge helps the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data, the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and the witness has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case. State courts may impose different rules. Arbitrators are not bound by either federal or state standards in evaluating the expert.

Once an expert witness is permitted to testify in arbitration, the party that called the expert asks questions to the expert through a direct examination. The opposing party may question the expert through a cross-examination. The arbitrators may also question the expert.

Securities dispute resolution: Enforcing awards | Securities dispute resolution: Filing a complaint

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 1 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.