Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

single-source requirement

Read a random definition: en gros

A quick definition of single-source requirement:

A single-source requirement is a rule in false advertising cases where the plaintiff must prove that they are the only supplier of the real product and that buyers would have chosen their product if they knew the truth about the defendant's product. This is a rare exception to the general rule that false advertising only applies to cases of passing off, trade defamation, and trade disparagement.

A more thorough explanation:

The single-source requirement is a legal term used in the common-law tort of false advertising. It refers to the necessity of proving that the plaintiff is the only supplier of the genuine goods in question and that buyers would have purchased the plaintiff's goods if they had known the true nature of the defendant's goods.

For example, let's say that Company A sells organic apples, and Company B sells conventional apples. If Company B falsely advertises their apples as organic, Company A would need to prove that they are the only supplier of organic apples and that customers would have bought their organic apples instead of Company B's conventional apples if they had known the truth.

The single-source requirement is a narrow exception to the common-law rule that the tort of false advertising only applies in cases of passing off, trade defamation, and trade disparagement. It is designed to protect businesses that have invested time and resources into creating a unique product or brand from unfair competition.

single-registration rule | single-subject rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.