Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

single-source requirement

Read a random definition: T.C.M.

A quick definition of single-source requirement:

A single-source requirement is a rule in false advertising cases where the plaintiff must prove that they are the only supplier of the real product and that buyers would have chosen their product if they knew the truth about the defendant's product. This is a rare exception to the general rule that false advertising only applies to cases of passing off, trade defamation, and trade disparagement.

A more thorough explanation:

The single-source requirement is a legal term used in the common-law tort of false advertising. It refers to the necessity of proving that the plaintiff is the only supplier of the genuine goods in question and that buyers would have purchased the plaintiff's goods if they had known the true nature of the defendant's goods.

For example, let's say that Company A sells organic apples, and Company B sells conventional apples. If Company B falsely advertises their apples as organic, Company A would need to prove that they are the only supplier of organic apples and that customers would have bought their organic apples instead of Company B's conventional apples if they had known the truth.

The single-source requirement is a narrow exception to the common-law rule that the tort of false advertising only applies in cases of passing off, trade defamation, and trade disparagement. It is designed to protect businesses that have invested time and resources into creating a unique product or brand from unfair competition.

single-registration rule | single-subject rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.