A more thorough explanation:

A Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP suit) is a type of lawsuit that is brought by individuals or entities to intimidate or silence their critics. The purpose of a SLAPP suit is not to win a legal claim, but rather to use the legal system to harass and burden the defendant with the cost of defending themselves.

SLAPP suits are often used by powerful individuals or corporations to silence whistleblowers, journalists, or activists who speak out against them. For example, a company might file a SLAPP suit against a journalist who writes a critical article about their business practices, in an attempt to prevent them from publishing similar articles in the future.

Many states have passed Anti-SLAPP statutes to protect individuals from these types of lawsuits. These laws make it easier for defendants to have SLAPP suits dismissed early on in the legal process, before they have to spend a lot of money on legal fees. In some cases, the plaintiff may even be required to pay the defendant's legal fees.

However, there are concerns about Anti-SLAPP statutes being too broad and preventing legitimate legal claims from being heard. It can be difficult to determine what constitutes a SLAPP suit, and some worry that these laws may discourage individuals from bringing valid claims of defamation or other legal issues.

Overall, SLAPP suits and Anti-SLAPP statutes are complex legal issues that involve important questions about free speech, civil procedure, and constitutional rights.

An example of a SLAPP suit might be a politician suing a citizen who criticizes their policies on social media. The politician may not have a valid legal claim, but by filing a lawsuit, they can intimidate the citizen and discourage them from speaking out in the future.