Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Slaughterhouse Cases

Read a random definition: MSJ

A quick definition of Slaughterhouse Cases:

The Slaughterhouse Cases were a group of legal cases that went to the US Supreme Court in 1873. The Court decided that the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution only protected the rights of people who were US citizens, not the rights of people who were citizens of a particular state. The Court also said that the rights of US citizens were limited and did not include civil rights. Some people disagreed with this decision and said that it made the Fourteenth Amendment meaningless.

A more thorough explanation:

The Slaughterhouse Cases refer to a decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1873. It involved a series of cases where the Court interpreted the privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Court's interpretation of the clause was that it protected the rights of people based on their U.S. citizenship, rather than their citizenship of a specific state. However, the Court defined these rights narrowly and excluded civil rights.

This decision has been criticized by some as rendering the clause meaningless.

For example, if a person is a U.S. citizen, they have the right to vote in federal elections. However, the Slaughterhouse Cases suggest that this right does not extend to state elections.

Overall, the Slaughterhouse Cases limited the scope of the privileges and immunities clause and had a significant impact on civil rights in the United States.

SLAPP suit | slavery

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
19:00
and been physicists and all that cool shit
19:00
instead we boutta do civ pro
19:00
ur unreal
19:01
i cant believe i would have been enrolled at UCI rn... its definitely a great school i just didnt feel like i fit in with the other students when i did pre orientation there
19:02
also they didnt give me enough money to justify the cost
Roll Tide
Dkk
19:06
UCI hella liberal and trans. I think you would like it. More liberal than like Berk and UCLA if you can imagine. @Eggan
Dkk
19:06
I did astrophysics for 3 years and hated it. Dropped out of my first college cus of it. @limpweeny
Dkk
19:07
Do not recommend studying physics. Super boring, a lot of math, and most results are not replicable.
Dkk
19:08
Ill say this though. I studied a lot of Otto Hahn and was happy to see him at the start of Oppenheimer. Made a little appearance. Nice tribute.
19:08
@Dkk: i know the makeup of UCI but im not from california and i didn't like how i'd have to be isolated from the labor movement since it's not very close to LA and OC is mostly a bunch of rich people tbh
19:09
i like berk's proximity to san francisco. the bay area is full of surprises when it comes to labor
19:11
thats why i'm mostly centered on cities with major labor activity this cycle (besides chicago) such as NYC, boston DC (where the union headquarters usually are)
19:11
Anyone else hella concerned w the uptick in applicants? Not sure if I can use the LSD data of the past to reference
some dean said they're only expecting 5-15% increase over the whole cycle, still not great, but not 30% like currently
19:15
Ohhh okay thank goodness. I saw +38% and lowk got scared
19:16
That doesn’t seem too bad if they increase class size by a bit 🙏
Dkk
19:23
Ahh that is true but OC Disney Unions. Can always be involved in those. Some of the biggest unions in California. I was part of that for a couple years but my union was corrupt. @Eggan
Dkk
19:24
Berk is definitely more fun. Unions in LA are of course the screen actors guild and then hospitality stuff like restaurants. It will be good wherever you go imo if that is what you are into.
Dkk
19:25
@sadpadresfan: yeah, Spivey said the same thing wasp pointed out. 30% to start to 15% at the end. I think part of it may also be people just want more variety. Maybe a similar amount of applicants but more variety. More waitlist movement potentially this year. Schools fighting harder for people.
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: the NU dean. Him and Spivey did a podcast on it.
And if you look at the numbers they're starting to come down. A couple weeks ago we were up 36 percent up, now we're only 26 percent up.
NotJustALawyer
21:03
@texaslawhopefully: if you are trying to do texas law, why not go to UT Austin. Probably better scholarships for you compared to Harvard and its a pipeline. Unless, of course, scholarships don't matter in your case.
i studied hard stem but i just hate being in an actual lab lol
depends on the type of lab work that you do, the only thing i did enjoy doing was bacterial genetics because that shit is super fast and fun, but working in a wet lab is just a lottttt of sitting and waiting around
hence law, lmao
@NotJustALawyer: I'm trying to do an appellate clerkship and the very top schools just have better placement. And yes, I'm still considering UT, but I think with my numbers I can get scholarship money at most of the T14.
Also I made my username before I had my lsat back and then UT was my top choice, but I’ve been somewhat open geographically. I also have ties to Texas so I don’t think it’d be hard to get back here if I left the state for law school.
Dkk
21:52
Deja Vu lol
[] baddestbunny
22:07
GM to the Queens whose titties move when they drive over speed bumps 🥰😘.. To the rest of y'all young men, Jiffy Lube hiring 🤨
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.