Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

United States v. Jones (2012)

Read a random definition: GBMI

A quick definition of United States v. Jones (2012):

In United States v. Jones (2012), the Supreme Court decided that it was against the Fourth Amendment for the FBI to put a GPS tracking device on a suspect's car without a proper warrant. The Court said that this was a "search" and violated the suspect's privacy. The case involved a man named Antoine Jones who was suspected of drug trafficking. The FBI put a GPS device on his wife's car and tracked his movements for 28 days. The Court said that this was not allowed because it was like the government was taking the man's property without permission. The Court also said that this case shows how technology is changing the way we think about privacy.

A more thorough explanation:

United States v. Jones is a Supreme Court case that dealt with the use of electronic tracking devices by law enforcement agencies. The case held that the placement and use of an electronic tracking device for 28 days on a suspect’s vehicle through an improperly executed warrant constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment.

For example, in 2004, the FBI used an electronic tracking device to track Antoine Jones, a suspect in a drug trafficking case. The device was placed on Jones’ vehicle without a proper warrant and was used to track his movements for 28 days. The Supreme Court ruled that this use of the device constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment.

The Court’s decision was based on the idea that the Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. The use of an electronic tracking device without a proper warrant was considered a violation of this protection.

The case is significant because it established that the use of electronic tracking devices by law enforcement agencies is subject to Fourth Amendment protections. This decision has implications for the use of other types of surveillance technologies, such as drones and facial recognition software.

United States v. Darby | United States v. Windsor (2013)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.