Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

United States v. Jones (2012)

Read a random definition: circumvention

A quick definition of United States v. Jones (2012):

In United States v. Jones (2012), the Supreme Court decided that it was against the Fourth Amendment for the FBI to put a GPS tracking device on a suspect's car without a proper warrant. The Court said that this was a "search" and violated the suspect's privacy. The case involved a man named Antoine Jones who was suspected of drug trafficking. The FBI put a GPS device on his wife's car and tracked his movements for 28 days. The Court said that this was not allowed because it was like the government was taking the man's property without permission. The Court also said that this case shows how technology is changing the way we think about privacy.

A more thorough explanation:

United States v. Jones is a Supreme Court case that dealt with the use of electronic tracking devices by law enforcement agencies. The case held that the placement and use of an electronic tracking device for 28 days on a suspect’s vehicle through an improperly executed warrant constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment.

For example, in 2004, the FBI used an electronic tracking device to track Antoine Jones, a suspect in a drug trafficking case. The device was placed on Jones’ vehicle without a proper warrant and was used to track his movements for 28 days. The Supreme Court ruled that this use of the device constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment.

The Court’s decision was based on the idea that the Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. The use of an electronic tracking device without a proper warrant was considered a violation of this protection.

The case is significant because it established that the use of electronic tracking devices by law enforcement agencies is subject to Fourth Amendment protections. This decision has implications for the use of other types of surveillance technologies, such as drones and facial recognition software.

United States v. Darby | United States v. Windsor (2013)

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
19:50
this is what i feel like when i get one single drill question right
19:50
when u get one wrong ;(
therapist slander detected
1a2b3c4d26z
20:37
Anyone got any polymarket locks
1a2b3c4d26z
20:37
Is anyone in here cool like fr cool
1a2b3c4d26z
20:37
Like watch college football cool
1a2b3c4d26z
20:37
Or like
1a2b3c4d26z
20:38
Frat
1a2b3c4d26z
20:39
Sorry guys I'm bored trying to get my Berkeley essay to 4 pages
20:40
no way they want four pages that’s crazy
20:41
bitches wanna be different sooo bad 😴
1a2b3c4d26z
20:42
Technically they want 3 to be completely fair to the powers that be, so I'm really trying to push out to 3
1a2b3c4d26z
20:42
But it's 1/2 inch margins
20:44
assuming it was 2 already, you’ve totally got 3 double spaced pages in you
20:45
should I watch the quirky umich dean videos? i feel like all of you have seen them except me but I can’t work up any enthusiasm for the idea
1a2b3c4d26z
20:54
I like Dean Z not sure why she gets slandered sometimes
1a2b3c4d26z
20:54
I would say yeah, they're helpful. But they can verge on unproductive and stress-inducing if you watch enough of them (especially the application read-through ones)
21:07
okay I’ll check them out
21:40
hey so where do i see my LSAC GPA bc i know they calculate it differently
21:40
sorry new to dis
You can calculate it here
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.