Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

vassallo faciendo superiori quod de jure facere oportet

Read a random definition: via actionis

A quick definition of vassallo faciendo superiori quod de jure facere oportet:

Term: VASSALLO FACIENDO SUPERIORI QUOD DE JURE FACERE OPORTET

Definition: This is a Latin phrase that means a vassal (a person who owes loyalty to a lord or king) must do what is required by law for their superior (their lord or king).

A more thorough explanation:

VASSALLO FACIENDO SUPERIORI QUOD DE JURE FACERE OPORTET

Vassallo faciendo superiori quod de jure facere oportet is a Latin term used in law. It means that the vassal must perform their duties to their superior according to the law.

An example of vassallo faciendo superiori quod de jure facere oportet is when a tenant pays rent to their landlord. The tenant is obligated to pay rent to their landlord according to the law, and the landlord is obligated to provide a safe and habitable living space for the tenant.

Another example is when an employee follows the rules and regulations set by their employer. The employee is obligated to follow the rules and regulations set by their employer according to the law, and the employer is obligated to provide a safe and fair working environment for the employee.

These examples illustrate the concept of vassallo faciendo superiori quod de jure facere oportet because they show how both parties have obligations to each other according to the law. The vassal (tenant or employee) must perform their duties to their superior (landlord or employer) according to the law, and the superior must provide a safe and fair environment for the vassal.

vassallo et quibus dederit | vassallus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.