Head-to-head · 52 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 94% chose CLS. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 52 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose CLS
Median scholarship (chose CLS)
Median scholarship (chose UCLA)
View all-time (206 cross-admits)
Trend · CLS's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2024 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About CLS vs UCLA
Across 52 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 94% enrolled at Columbia University and 6% at University of California—Los Angeles. The split has shifted -2 points across the tracked cycles.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares Columbia University and University of California—Los Angeles across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 52 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 52 applicants admitted to both schools, 94% chose to attend Columbia University. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
Both schools are closely ranked in U.S. News: #9 and #13, separated by just 4 positions, making cross-admit data especially useful for deciding between them.
Columbia University is located in New York City, New York, while University of California—Los Angeles is in Los Angeles, California. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: Columbia University places 65.4% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 50.5% for the other school. This 15 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, University of California—Los Angeles has lower tuition at $59,084 per year compared to $85,368. Combined with employment rates of 95.6% (CLS) and 94.4% (UCLA), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Among cross-admitted applicants, University of California—Los Angeles offered a median scholarship of $120,000 compared to $108,833, a difference of $11,167 that may factor into enrollment decisions.