Head-to-head · 68 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 97% chose UMich. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 68 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose UMich
Median scholarship (chose UMich)
Median scholarship (chose WUSTL)
View all-time (262 cross-admits)
Trend · UMich's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2024 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About UMich vs WUSTL
Across 68 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 97% enrolled at University of Michigan and 3% at Washington University in St. Louis.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares University of Michigan and Washington University in St. Louis across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 68 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 68 applicants admitted to both schools, 97% chose to attend University of Michigan. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
Both schools are closely ranked in U.S. News: #9 and #13, separated by just 4 positions, making cross-admit data especially useful for deciding between them.
There is a meaningful difference in admissions competitiveness: Washington University in St. Louis has a median LSAT of 175 compared to 171, a gap of 4 points. This suggests applicants to Washington University in St. Louis face a more competitive admissions pool.
University of Michigan is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 8.6% compared to Washington University in St. Louis's 19.0%.
University of Michigan is located in Ann Arbor, Michigan, while Washington University in St. Louis is in St. Louis, Missouri. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of Michigan places 50.3% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 39.3% for the other school. This 11 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
Among cross-admitted applicants, Washington University in St. Louis offered a median scholarship of $158,000 compared to $120,000, a difference of $38,000 that may factor into enrollment decisions.