Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

adoption by reference

Read a random definition: officiousness

A quick definition of adoption by reference:

Adoption by reference is when you include one document inside another document. This is done by saying that the second document is part of the first one. For example, if you have a contract and you want to include another document, you can say that the second document is part of the contract. This is called incorporation by reference. It's important to make sure that the second document is clearly identified so that everyone knows what it is. This can also be used in patents to include information from other documents.

A more thorough explanation:

Adoption by reference is a legal term that refers to the process of making a secondary document part of a primary document by including a statement in the primary document that the secondary document should be treated as if it were contained within the primary one. This is also known as incorporation by reference.

One example of adoption by reference is with contracts. If a contract refers to another document, such as a set of terms and conditions, and includes a statement that the terms and conditions should be treated as if they were part of the contract, then the terms and conditions are considered to be incorporated by reference into the contract.

Another example is with patents. If a patent application includes information that is already contained in another document, such as another patent or patent application, then the information can be incorporated by reference into the patent application.

Adoption by reference is a way to make a document more concise and clear by referring to another document that contains relevant information. This can be useful in legal documents, such as contracts and patents, where there may be a lot of information to include. By incorporating information by reference, the document can be shorter and easier to understand.

adoption by estoppel | adoption-registry statute

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 10 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:51
Do you need camera on/mic on for those Lets Talk Cornell things? I kinda want to attend but I'm at work
jackfrost11770
16:51
I have no idea I've never been to one
jackfrost11770
16:51
Hence Idk what to expect even capacity wise
jackfrost11770
16:51
But I'm literally still 30 minutes from home and it's in 10 min so unless I join on my phone with no camera or mic then I cannot lmao
jackfrost11770
16:55
You know what if Cornell don't want me they don't me I'm not worrying myself over this
16:57
There was a Vandy wave today?
GodsPlanUltimately
16:57
@jackfrost11770: What a excellent mindset. Cornell must have poor taste
1. Kansas 196. Cornell
nope cornell can be 2.
cornell is incredibly based
our professors are sigmapilled goonmaxxers
i see, a quality education
GodsPlanUltimately
16:59
Interesting folks.
jackfrost11770
17:00
Cornell put me on reserve after interview they are at least slightly unbased
@jackfrost11770: thats why they sit at 2
cornell is based but universal rule is adcoms are ghouls
texaslawhopefully
17:01
this is depressing lol: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/boilingfrogs/shock-and-awe/
Dkk
17:01
@GodsPlanUltimately smart of them
Dkk
17:02
How is it unpopular when he got the pop vote and the electoral college. Unreadable after the title.
Who’s hearing from uclaaa rnnnn
texaslawhopefully
17:03
Glad you're back dk lmao. If you read the actual article, it's that his day one EO's are wildly unpopular (for instance the majority of americans support birthright citizenship). He can have won the popular vote and still do unpopular stuff
texaslawhopefully
17:03
"Two recent polls found opposition to pardoning the J6ers at 57 and 59 percent, respectively, and that was before Americans understood that even the cop-beaters in the crowd that day would be let off scot-free."
I wonder if this chat has mods
17:04
as most dictators who have come into power do, he appealed to the masses just to turn face once in power
Barely nutty
Dkk
17:04
@texas maybe so. Maybe so.
17:04
we have been duped.
17:05
Oh well there is always the next election.* *- unless there are no more elections.
texaslawhopefully
17:05
I lean conservative and for a long time was one of those people who thought that he was bad but wasn't a facist and that sort of rhetoric was over-reactive. And for those reasons I voted for Harris, but I think I was underestimating him by far.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.