Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

incorporation by reference

Read a random definition: quality

A quick definition of incorporation by reference:

Definition: Incorporation by reference is a way of making one document part of another document by saying that the second document should be treated as if it were included in the first one. This is often used in contracts and wills, where a separate document is referred to and described in such a way that its identity is clear. It can also be used in patents, where information from one patent or patent application is included in another one. This is done when there is no other practical way to convey the information in words, and when it is more concise and clear to refer to a graphic element.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Incorporation by reference is a method of making a secondary document part of a primary document by including in the primary document a statement that the secondary document should be treated as if it were contained within the primary one.

For example, in a contract, a document can be incorporated by reference if it is referred to and described in the contract in such a way that the document's identity is clear beyond doubt. This means that the secondary document becomes a part of the contract and is legally binding.

In patents, incorporation by reference is the explicit inclusion in one patent application of information already contained in another document, such as another patent or patent application. This is often used in a continuing application to cite the disclosure contained in a parent application.

Overall, incorporation by reference is a way to include important information from one document into another document without having to repeat it all over again. It is important to make sure that the secondary document is clearly identified and described in the primary document to avoid any confusion or legal issues.

incorporamus | in corpore

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 4 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.