Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

informant's privilege

Read a random definition: Published work

A quick definition of informant's privilege:

Informant's privilege is a legal right that allows the government to keep the identity and communications of its informants confidential. This means that the government does not have to reveal who gave them information or what was said. However, this privilege can be overcome if the need for the information outweighs the public interest in maintaining the privilege.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Informant's privilege is a qualified privilege that allows the government to prevent the disclosure of the identity and communications of its informants. It is a legal right that exempts an informant from the duty to testify or reveal information in court.

Example: In a criminal case, the prosecution may rely on information provided by a confidential informant to establish probable cause for a search warrant or an arrest. The informant's identity and communications are protected by the informant's privilege, which means that the government does not have to disclose them to the defense or the court. However, the defense may challenge the validity of the search or arrest by showing that the informant's information was unreliable or false.

Explanation: The informant's privilege is based on the public interest in encouraging citizens to report criminal activity to law enforcement without fear of retaliation or exposure. It is a balancing test between the government's need for secrecy and the defendant's right to a fair trial. The privilege is not absolute and can be overcome by a showing of necessity or relevance. For example, if the informant is a material witness to the crime or has exculpatory evidence, the defense may be entitled to discover the informant's identity or statements. However, if the informant's

informal probate | in forma pauperis affidavit

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
snow
12:07
you're good, i was just making sure. yeah, i would take it to trial
snow
12:07
you just need one juror
snow
12:07
but i think that if i were the state, i would not be scared to bust the jury if i had to
I mean, you only need one juror to get a hung jury and a retrial, you need all 12 to get found innocent
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
I do not see him doing a long time, if he is not punished hard then more (less attractive) crazy people will come out and start murdering for social justice and expect the same
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
*him not doing a long time
snow
12:08
need to see what all he is charged with tbh
snow
12:09
and the possibility for parole in new york
snow
12:09
in texas murder is a 3g offense and he would have to do have that time before parole eligibility. idk how new york works
snow
12:11
half
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:11
Too public of a case, they have to go hard on the dude and in a couple years when people forget I am sure he can apply and get a lesser sentence or possibility of parole added. Dude needs to blame all the self medication he did
snow
12:13
that works in his favor that the case is public, at least this case. thats why i think the state shouldnt be scared to bust the jury if they really want to get him
@snow: I don't know what you mean by "bust the jury"
Can you elaborate?
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:15
I also do not forsee him being the kind of person being able to function and be good in prison. Going to be a wake up call
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:16
He thinks his back is broke now... wait until Bubbah shows him what a broke back really is
snow
12:16
yep, in jury selection you get a panel of jurors come in and from there you eliminate the ones that you dont want, until you get twelve. "busting the jury panel" means that there wouldnt be enough jurors to form a jury for the case so they would have to get another panel
windyMagician
12:17
uw sending cycle update emails when they've had me in complete for 2 months is crazy work
snow
12:17
so if i were the state, i wouldnt be scared to go through multiple panels to get a good jury. the judge would probs be mad but oh well
windyMagician
12:18
he'll be fine in prison. he also probably has a fed case being built against him.
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:18
I imagine getting a non-biased jury will be very hard
snow
12:18
thats why the state shouldnt be scared to go through multiple panels. the judge would probs get mad but its your case to prove
That makes sense. It's a plus for the state as well, since it's not like they're going to let him make bail. Any time up to the trial he'll just spend in jail
windyMagician
12:19
they got unbiased panels for Nikolas Cruz and Daniel Penny, it'll be fine
snow
12:19
yeah, but I think those were capital cases
snow
12:19
jury selection is different for capital cases
windyMagician
12:19
Daniel penny was not a capital case
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:19
@windyMagician: I would say depends the prison, I have met a lot of golden spoon children who could not handle the strictness of the military and lack of freedom. So many attempted suicides. I am sure prison is much worse
snow
12:20
ohh the subway guy, my b
windyMagician
12:20
not tryna be racist but he just needs to stick with the italians
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.